+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Chevrolet: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

  1. #1
    GasSaver
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)


    "Ted" <com> wrote in message
    news:googlegroups.com... 



    See now people? I told you, many hybrid customers are unhappy with their
    crappy hybrids.

    For only 4% of a hybrid cost you can have a much better stronger and more
    efficient vehicle than that of yours. OFS' prices are right, quit
    complaining about my English and focus on what is practical for you and
    your family. See when you look for a well-speaking salesman, the result
    is quite bitter isn't it? Come to see me and speak French or Thai with
    me.

    GasSaver

    www.extra150miles.com



  2. #2
    residualselfimage1999@gmail.com
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)




    On Apr 21, 12:36*am, "GasSaver" <com>
    wrote: 


    On a 650 mile super highway trip from DC to Detroit
    I got 32.5 miles per gallon on a 1990 Honda Accord LX 4dr
    with automatic transmission using a 2.2L motor.
    A skilled hypermiler probably could have gotten
    even better.

    The report's I've heard is that in the hands
    of a skilled/Hypermiler driver a 2009 Honda
    Civic Hybrid can get over 50 mpg and a
    2009 Toyota Prius can get over 75 mpg.

     


    To gain the maximum advantage, a gas electric hybrids
    requires that the driver learn a new skill set - not everyone
    will be willing or capable of doing so.


     


    Extra150miles.com is selling an on board diagonistic II
    (OBD II) instantaneous fuel efficiency display (iFED)
    called the Scan Gauge II which requires that your car
    be newer than 1997 if I recall correctly. This after market
    iFED cost about $150 to $180 dollars most of the time.
    CleanMpg.com review of "Scan Gauge II" indicates
    it can help the driver gain about a 20% increase
    in fuel Efficiency (FE). An iFED tells the driver
    how to save fuel by showing the car's instanteous
    fuel usage. Reports I have read on the internet
    suggest very light subcompacts like the
    2009 Honda Fit benefit the most from iFEDs;
    subcompacts could increase their FE by about
    40%. - Smaller, lighter, more aerodynamic,
    more fuel efficent vehicles would benefit more from
    a iFED than a larger, heavier, less aerodynamic,
    less fuel efficent vehicle like the Hummer H2.

    Mileage improvenment gained from using any
    iFED (aka Scan Gauge II) is dependent on the
    driver learning how to slowly accelerate, coasting
    when going down hill, learning slow down going uphill,
    doing a technique called a Pulse and Glide (P&G)
    on flat terrain, keeping the car speed under 45mph,
    not stopping (e.g. adjusting the car's speed to match
    green lights at traffic lights), turning off the a/c,
    rolling up the windows, reducing the weigh/cargo
    of the car, and keeping the tires at their max
    rated inflation for lowest rolling resistant.
    There are also additional FE techniques available
    to PHEV and HEV which are not relevant to
    non PHEV/HEVs..


  3. #3
    Happy
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

    On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:28:29 -0700 (PDT),
    com wrote:
     

    Most new cars (from GM anyway) have this function built in to the
    engine management computer and dashboard display.

    No need to buy it again from the Scan Gauge folks or
    Extra150miles.com.

    The weakness is that it is optionally displayed, not by default all
    the time. And the intervals are not sensible to help as much as
    possible in tuning your driving habits.

    Also, in the owner's manual they do not explain very well if at all
    how to increase your mileage using the display.

    I would hazard an estimate that if all manufacturers would display
    this information all the time by default, and make it slightly more
    useful and accurate by doing a running average over a short time
    period like approx. 3 to 5 seconds, and also educated drivers on how
    to use it, we would see a vast reduction in gas-guzzling driving
    habits like speeding, jack-rabbit starts, speeding up to a red light,
    trying to maintain speed up steep hills (like your stupid cruise
    control does), and other things that hit you right in the wallet.

    By watching the display, but still travelling at a fair clip at the
    right times, I regularly get 30+ mpg (imp.) in my 2009 Chev Uplander
    Van.

    If you only knew what it was costing you to drive like Jensen Button,
    we'd never have a gas shortage!


  4. #4
    Hipupchuck
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

    GasSaver wrote: 

    Why don't you try a Jetta TDI that gets 50mpg on diesel and will climb
    those hills with the AC on.

  5. #5
    Hipupchuck
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

    Happy Trails wrote: 

    The US car companies are feeding you all full of bullshit. They could
    easily make a diesel hybrid that could get 80mpg but they WILL NOT!

  6. #6
    Canuck57
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)


    "Hipupchuck" <com> wrote in message
    news:com... 

    Problem is US auto doesn't know how to make them. Seriously.

    Even Chrysler has Cummins do it. Duramax is a hangover but hardly car
    material.



  7. #7
    Mike
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)


    "Hipupchuck" <com> wrote in message
    news:com...
     

    OK Mr. Engineer - please enlighten us... how could they produce this 80 mpg
    diesel easily? No one else is doing it, but US companies could do it
    easily? Beyond your bullshit, just what do you have to substantiate this
    claim?

    --

    -Mike-
    net



  8. #8
    Mike
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

    Get real! If any auto manufacture could build a vehicle, that buyers would
    want to buy that got 80 MPG, they certainly would built it.

    Think about it, dummy, they would control the market with such a vehicle.
    LOL


    "Hipupchuck" <com> wrote in message news:-> 



  9. #9
    Björn
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

    On May 11, 4:18*pm, "Mike" <com> wrote: 

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars/1267946.html

    GM's Precept Hybrid Gets 80 MPG
    GM’s five-passenger Precept hybrid gets an honest-to-goodness 80 mpg.

    Published in the January 2001 issue.

  10. #10
    George
    Guest

    Re: Why GM Shouldn't Fail (and why hybrids are crap)

    hipupchuck suggested:
     

    VW diesels are timing belt, non-free running. When the belt breaks or
    jumps, you're going to buy a new engine.

    Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
    non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
    reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
    di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
    Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
    https://www.mixmaster.it



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48