+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Chrysler: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

  1. #1
    TOM
    Guest

    What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    I just bought it, it's a cherry 2001 with 25,000 miles on it.
    I filled the gas tank up after driving about 125 miles of suburban driving
    (just north of Pittsburgh, PA) and then about 60 miles of I-79 driving. It took
    11.5 gallons to fill it up after driving 185 miles. 16 miles to the
    gallon!!!!!???
    The original window sticker lists 20 mpg City, 25 mpg Highway.
    I realize this isn't guaranteed, but combined City/Highway driving results in
    four miles less to the gallon than I should be getting in the city????
    Something has to be wrong with it.



  2. #2
    Punch
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??


    "TOM KAN PA" <comic> wrote in message
    news:aol.com... 
    took 
    in 

    yep the pt cruiser is a gas guzzler, weighs allot and has a week motor.
    enjoy.

    Punch



  3. #3
    C.
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    You cannot reliably calculate gas mileage on the basis of one tankful.
    Keep a book and figure the average over 5 tank fulls. If the mileage
    isn't better than 16 after that, start looking for the problem -
    although the problem might be your driving style.

    Ed

    TOM KAN PA wrote: 

  4. #4
    Matthew
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    C. E. White wrote: 

    Especially if you don't know that it was full to start with!


    Matt


  5. #5
    Rick
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    C. E. White wrote:
     

    I agree with that. The PT Cruiser "learns" your driving style over a
    number of starts. Drive judiciously on moderate length, speed trips
    and your mileage should improve. Mine did. - RM


  6. #6
    PT_Sean
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??


    "TOM KAN PA" <comic> wrote in message
    news:aol.com... 
    took 



    Are the tires properly inflated? (check when they are cold).

    Air filter- 2001, might be time for a swap.

    Was the a/c on (or the defroster which will run the a/c)??

    Is there ANY chance that the emerg. brake was used, and is now not fully
    returned to running mode??

    Some have mentioned a little better economy with synthetic oil, not sure on
    that one though.



    You should get close to 300 miles to the tank. (500 kms here)

    S



  7. #7
    TOM
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    << You should get close to 300 miles to the tank. >>


    ____Reply Separator_____

    That means I had to put 115 miles on the last 1/4 tank.



  8. #8
    Punch
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??


    "PT_Sean" <ca> wrote in message
    news:_Wnjb.8330$bellglobal.com... 
    driving 
    It 
    on 

    I have the 2003 PT Turbo GT and get 450 KM, and thats my everyday driving
    style, pushing it i get 350km per tank.

    Punch



  9. #9
    Richard
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    You SHOULD get alot better mileage then that. But remember that the
    PT is very heavy and shaped like a brick ( wind resistance). If you
    are like me, when I get a different car, I am ALWAYS ON THE GO PEDAL
    to see what it will do. Possibly your driving habits are the results.
    Yes, you need to AVERAGE out your mileage by doing ATLEAST 5 fuel
    refills and keep track of mileage and amount of fuel used. THEN
    figure your mileage.
    GOOD LUCK



    "Punch" <crash2000@sympatico@.ca> wrote in message news:<rs_jb.10528$bellglobal.com>... 

  10. #10
    doc
    Guest

    Re: What's wrong with my PT Cruiser??

    comic (TOM KAN PA) wrote: 

    Might be. The Cruiser doesn't have the best mpg because it has the
    aerodynamics of a tombstone. Add in a puffy automatic transmission with an
    anemic 4-cylinder and you're cruising down low-mileage city.

    Lose the back seats, go with the 5-speed, and shed all the weight you can,
    and you'll see a dramatic increase in gas mileage, not to mention
    performance. That auto-trans in the Cruiser is pure crap, BTW, and always
    has been.

    No power, no way, with the standard engine and an auto. The cruiser rips
    with a manual and sits with an auto.

    It's a little surprising that they can charge extra for less power, and
    even more surprising that people still go for it, but no one ever went
    broke underestimating the intelligence of the American consumer.


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48