Formula 1: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
Malachi Constant <com> wrote in message news:<com>...
It was _INITIATED_ by Rubens. Try to understand what you read. You
make W look intelligent.
Oh you are on crack too. Ignorant dolt.
-mph
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 07:35:15 +0100, Ian Dalziel
<net> wrote:
They weren't at the braking zone yet tho...
Although Ralf is very well known for misjudging braking zones, come to
think of it...
Are you actually implying this might be the first time Ralf braked
early?
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 00:30:58 -0400, "Rick Baumhauer"
<net> wrote:
Irregardless of all of that...
It still sounds like Rubens had a better start than Ralf...
And Dennis did fault the bad start of RUBENS...
Had Ralf performed a better start, he would not have had the
opportunity to punt faultless contenders...
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
CatharticF1 <net> wrote in
news
ptus.net.au:
This is the only bit I don't understand. Where should Kimi go? He is
essentially past Rubens by the accident - Rubens' front wheel hits his back
wheel - and he impacts with Ralf's car on the sidepod having slowed
slightly and rotated. That to me says he was almost level with Ralf. Should
he really have moved onto the grass (and at that speed, and that corner,
into the gravel and out of the race) just because Ralf wanted to be further
over? If Rubens had been just a little less quick off the line, and Ralf
and Kimi both cleared him, they would have been virtually level, all but,
by turn 1. Kimi would have been on the racing line, and Ralf would have
been trying to claim it from maybe 1 or 2 feet ahead. I don't believe Ralf
would have the right to just drive Kimi off the road from there - this
isn't banger racing or the BTCC.
There's also no way Rubens could or should have hit the brakes early - he
would have simply caused whoever was behind him to run into the back of his
car. So I fail to see who but Ralf had the option of safe avoiding action.
Kimi was giving Rubens room, Rubens was giving Kimi room, and Ralf was
driving like there was no one else on track but him.
--
Phil
Dodge this.
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
> Seems you've forgotten the 3rd car.
No, I didn't forget the third car. It was on the grass. How in the world
could anyone expect Ralf to see another car outside of Rubens on the grass?
You don't seem to be giving it a fair analysis.
JD
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
On 4 Aug 2003 01:10:50 GMT, C Story <magma.ca> wrote:
"I want my LSD TV"...
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
In article <optus.net.au>,
CatharticF1 <net> wrote:
He didn't -- he stayed outside. Ralf moved over a whole lane.
He was ahead of Ralf. Mirrors don't work that way.
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
In article <teranews.com>,
The One <com> wrote:
It looked like you're having trouble tying your shoelances again.
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:07:48 GMT, "JD" <net> wrote:
Dunno what car was on the grass but it certainly was not Kimi! If it
was Kimi then what the hell was he doing driving off the race track
(the other side of the solid white line) to overtake a car? I would
call that taking an unacceptable risk.
Engelkott
-
Re: Ron Dennis blames Rubens for crash????
In message <easynet.co.uk>,
rocketmail.com writes
My view exactly.
And three days ago, people were still telling me why Ralf is better than
JPM, and accusing me of blind fanaticism for doubting it.
--
Richard Miller
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules