Chrysler: Pacifica Lease

"Chris Meyer" <net> wrote in message
news:supernews.com...

Are you sure you want to sink $$$ into a 1st year model run? I'd wait 2-3
years for them to work the kinks out and put away the $$$ and plan for
2006-2007 model and that would also solve your financing problem with the
Durango...

"James C. Reeves" <nospam.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Note the operative phrase: "We like a new car often"

Basically they are thinking exactly like the factory wants them to. There's
nothing wrong with this if they are wealthy. However, I don't think that
they
are, because of the second operative phrase:

"currently owe more then it is worth in trade"

You see, in order to have 1, you have to accept 2. They don't want to
accept
2 and are under the delusion that simply leasing the car will magically make
the
factory bear the 1st year depreciation hit.

People that can afford "a new car often" don't finance. They drive in with
the
old car, take whatever the dealer gives them in trade, then pull out their
checkbook
and write a check for the balance, then drive out with the new car.

Ted

Ted,

Wow, I can't thank you enough for making so many personal assumptions
about my family. The use of third person language, as if your really
not talking to me, but using me as an example, is extra keen.

Please don't make any assumptions about our financial situation. We
have a Durango that we owe more on then it is worth, that is not
uncommon and it is not a significant amount, its just that with a
growing family needs and expectations of your vehicle change. The
Durango is a beautiful truck and I enjoy it, but I have a relative
that we care for that has a hard time getting in and out of it and the
pacifica, while not the easiest car on the market for her, was a nice
balance between what we need (Space for kids and dogs), not a minivan
and ability for her to get in and out.

As a young family, we have lots of expenses and planning for
retirement, even if it is over 30 years away is a priority. I would
much rather put an extra $100 into my retirement each month then pay
it on a car that is depreciating in front of my eyes (the difference
between the lease and purchase (even assuming 0% interest) is over
$180/mo.

Yes, we do like a new car, something that is differnt. If you can
keep the same car for 12 years, that is fantastic, it really is; but
it's not for me.

I loath flamers even though that is what I am basically doing here.

Comments like these make posting to newgroups almost a waste of time.
Someone is looking for general advise on a something they are not
familiar on (notice how I can use the third person too) and gets
sarcastic responses. At least it's easy to ignore people with account
blocks.

Enough on that though...

Thanks James. You make a good point on the first year model. I guess
I'm somewhat comforted by the warrany covering the car while I lease
it, but you make a valid point.

My wife and I have decided to wait on a Pacifica, it appears that
sales are not what they expected as evidenced by the jump in
incentives this week. Since they came out in Early spring, I expect
that by Feb and March we'll be looking at considerable discounts like
they do each year with Durango and other DC models.

Thanks,

Chris


"Ted Mittelstaedt" <placo.com> wrote in message news:<newscache$ue1umh$75l1$ipinc.net>... 

Chris,

When you post in a FORUM you should expect all kinds of responses to
your questions. Accept and filter the responses and then do as you
wish to do. If you try to limit and or admonish posters, you may find
that you won't get any response the next time. WE post what we think
and we all have different backgrounds and experiences. Accept and
build on these and make your decisions.
GOOD LUCK to you.

Richard,

You're absolutly right, and I welcome all comments that are both good
and bad about the product for which I am researching, I however do NOT
like it when people make assumtions about things such as my families
financial situation. Esspecially when the reply goes so far as to
reapond in the third person.

I am an avid user and supporter of newgroups, I use them every single
day and moderate several, this was my first post to this newsgoup and
probably my last. If you read Teds comments, it is clear that he is
not being respectful and is quite honestly rude.

I appreciate your comments and thank you for the good luck :-)

Chris


@hotmail.com (Richard Benner Jr) wrote in message news:<google.com>... 

Why care what he says. If the NG is valuable to you, use it. If not,
don't. But don't be influenced by someone's post.


"Chris Meyer" <net> wrote in message
news:google.com... 
good 
NOT 
single 
and 
news:<google.com>... 
responses to 
you 
find 
think 

Chris Meyer wrote: 

If your skin is that thin, then you are making the right choice deciding
not to post here again. Every ng I've ever participated in has had
people who are rude almost all the time (Lloyd is the best example in
this group) and people who may be rude once in a blue moon (Ted falls
into this category). If you can't take that, then you shouldn't
participate.


Matt

"Chris Meyer" <net> wrote in message
news:google.com... 

Uh, my comments were directed to James, not to you. I really wasn't
talking to you.
 

That's fine but you didn't say that. Go back and reread your initial
post - the only reason that you were giving that you wanted to get
rid of the Durango was because you like a new car often. In short,
the impression given was of someone that just liked buying new
cars all the time, yet was carping a bit that the depreciation was
too fast for their taste, and I posted/ranted accordingly.

It is all on the phrasing. Usenet and other electronic media are
very literal, and you cannot depend on non-verbal communication.
If you had spoken your first paragraph in a conversation you
can control the non-verbals and it doesen't come across in an
unexpected manner. With the written word, you have to be
very explicit if you don't want it misinterpreted.
 

To be honest I think that perhaps what killed you with the Durango is
that you held on to it for 2 years, rather than just holding on to it for
a single year and then selling it and buying another new car. (and then
continuing to do that every year, if you like new cars all the time)
 

Well, it's all in the choices. Just as long
as your not going to have any regrets
come retirement time that you didn't save more money than you
did, there's no harm in it.
 

It's been said of Usenet that the value of what you get is worth exactly
what you paid for it. ;-)
 

I think probably even earlier, in December/January. We are heading into
the big retail spike of the year and I have a feeling that this Christmas
shopping year is going to be the worst in the last 3, and a lot of people
and companies are going to then be deferring major purchases (like cars).

Ted