Toyota: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
Tha Ghee wrote:
Tha, maybe think about quitting your Dominoes delivery job and move to
something else? These were not designed to be for life and to raise a
family on. The first clue should of been "they have no pension plans"
There are entry level jobs. If you remain poor, its you own fault. If
you think you will become wealthy when a demoncrat comes to the White
House, you are just a mooch and a parasite.
-
MikeHunt2@mailcity.com
Guest
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
I didn't make up anything, it is all in the Congressional Record
for those willing to look. The question as posed can not be
answered. Without the tax RATE cut the income to the government
would not have increased at the rate that it did, so how can one
know what any difference there would have been? The question of
how much the deficit actually would have been lowered is a math
question, answerable buy deducting the actual amount of spending
increases over the previous year. What counts is how much income
there is to support the spending. If it is higher you have a
budget surplus, if not a have deficit in the budget. History
shows that when the government has more of your money
to spend they will spend more of you money to buy your votes.
mike hunt
Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
com wrote:
To conclude and summarize (for the others here who care about serious
debate):
1) You claim to have done research but won't present the numbers.
2) Your not man enough to acknowledge that your definitive claim that
the Reagan tax cut did not increase the deficit cannot possibly be known
one way or the other (because we cannot definitively know what revenue
would have been without the tax cut).
3) When presented with the fact that tax revenue went down in the first
five years after the Reagan tax cut, which coincides with the explosion
in the debt, you change your tune and claim (again without reference)
that Reagan claimed it would take 10 years to turn the economy around.
That's a laughable claim because the economy was booming in each of 2nd
through 5th years after the tax cut. In spite of that boom, tax
revenues were smaller than they were the year before the Reagan tax cut.
Josh Rosenbluth
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
FJ40 ® wrote:
Sharxster's hyperbole is well known but... you can usually identify
it by the punctuation with curse words. ;-)
--
~~Philip
"Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
Tha Ghee wrote:
The Stock Market peaked about 7 months before the end of Clinton's
presidency and was clearly on a downward trend when Bush took office.
Look at some charts.
--
~~Philip
"Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
Neither of you have provided "evidence" (a URL to reliable sources)
and frankly, Josh seems befuddled by information that doesn't jive
with other information he has memorized without analysis.
--
~~Philip
"Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
MikeHunt speaks for fundamentally sound economics.
--
~~Philip
"Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
MikeHunt: What history has recorded
Josh Rosenbluth: What might have been if only.....
--
~~Philip
"Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
"FJ40 ®" <invalid> wrote in message
news:com...
Well, I am one Canadian who would rather have the U.S. dominate the world
than the saps we have in Ottawa, Paris and Berlin.
lane-changes." - dizz
Aerostar or Windstar.
ignition switch fires,
drop "star" from Aerostar
-
Re: OT 9/11 Thanks Slick Willie
"Josh Rosenbluth" <net> wrote in message
news:net...
news:<com>...
Typical LIEbrawl.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules