+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Ferrari: [OT] $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

  1. #1
    F2004:
    Guest

    [OT] $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    The new 2005 Ford POS...

    http://www.heritageclassics.com/ford/05gt/Page.html

    ...."$259,500". About $100k over sticker, and getting it.

    "ONE OF THE FIRST TWENTY GTs AVAILABLE WITH ALL SEVEN RECALLS
    COMPLETED"!!!

    LOFL...

    ...."ALL SEVEN RECALLS COMPLETED", "$259,000".

    *
    http://www.blueovalnews.com/2005/advisory/lane.gtengseatbelt19feb05.htm

    http://www.blueovalnews.com/2004/recalls/recall.ford.gt.19dec04.htm


  2. #2
    Tiger
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    F2004: 15 of 17*·** wrote:
    <<http://www.blueovalnews.com/2004/recalls/recall.ford.gt.19dec04.htm>>

    BlueOvalNews.com is the last place I would go to get accurate info on
    Ford. The info they published on our race program was flat out wrong.

    I don't know about any of the other recalls, but I know that the
    problem with the suspension pieces is that they were manufactured out
    of spec. They didn't build what Ford asked them to build. They haven't
    actually had any problems with them, but since the quality isn't what
    was contracted for, they are recalling them just to be on the safe
    side. Of course, that doesn't explain how they got on the cars in the
    first place.

    C.


  3. #3
    F2004:
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    On 16 Mar 2005 18:33:57 -0800, "Tiger Racing" <com>
    wrote: 

    http://tinyurl.com/4tkkz
    "Back in December, inspectors had found cracks in some cars’ control
    arms, and Ford asked all owners not to drive their cars until the
    company could replace the parts,"
     

    http://www.qv500.com/news07.php
     

    ....POS, is JOB1.



  4. #4
    ar50troll@gmail.com
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    My daily driver is a 02 Viper with a Roe Supercharger kit. I catch a
    lot of crap from the Ford Klan that the GT is a better car. Granted
    Viper has had a few recalls, but nothin on the scale of the GT. My
    Viper buries the Gt for 175 grand less. Funny as hell...


  5. #5
    Tiger
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    com wrote:
    <<I catch a lot of crap from the Ford Klan>>

    That's not even funny.

    << My Viper buries the Gt for 175 grand less. Funny as hell...>>

    It'll outrun a Ferrari too. So what?

    C.


  6. #6
    ar50troll@gmail.com
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    I agree on the "So What" I don't abuse any of my cars. But for some
    reason a lot of gear heads make an issue out of top speed. I had some
    idiot at a car show say his riced out Supra could beat my stock 512.
    Big fucking deal. It's still a Supra. You can sprinkle glitter on a
    turd and it's still a turd. He and I had what must have been a 2 hour
    argument over whether or not his Supra qulaified as a supercar. I
    don't know about you, but a supercar leaves the factory as a supercar.
    It's a class of vehicle. Lambo, Aston, Ferrari, Viper are supercars.
    A Supra no matter what you put on it is not a supercar...
    I don't care if any car goes 200 miles an hour. I don't intend on
    driving mine that fast. That idoits Supra will never hold the passion
    of my Ferrari...ever.


  7. #7
    F2004:
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    On 23 Mar 2005 23:53:10 -0800, com wrote:
     

    ....One of those things is NOT like the others.


  8. #8
    ar50troll@gmail.com
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    If your implying Viper is no super car as your posting history
    suggests, you are incorrect. It is by definition a supercar. Deny it
    if you like but facts are facts.


  9. #9
    F2004:
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...

    On 26 Mar 2005 00:18:48 -0800, com wrote: 

    LOFL



  10. #10
    ar50troll@gmail.com
    Guest

    Re: $259,500, "Seven product recalls/advisories since [its June '04] launch"*...


    F2004: 15 of 18*·** wrote:


    Instead of being ignorant, could you explain why you mistakenly
    categorize Viper as a non supercar when it meets all the requirements
    and is insured and sold as such? You posting history of anti Viper
    posts does explain a lot. But you are indeed on shaky ground if you
    truly believe that Viper is not a genuine Supercar...because plain and
    simple it is.
    It would be nice to know if you base your opinion on any facts or if
    it's just more America bashing.



 
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48