+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Lexus: LS400 vs RX300

  1. #1
    Owen
    Guest

    LS400 vs RX300

    My wife and I (no kids) are looking for a car to replace our Integra
    sedan that we have driven for the last 14 years. We will use it for
    grocery shopping and occasional road trips (I have a Miata for daily
    use).

    We both like the RX300, and have found several '99s right around the
    $20k mark. But I wonder if a '98 LS400 might be a better choice (for
    the same price) over the long term. For just the two of us we don't
    need a huge car, but the LS we looked at was quite a bit plusher than
    the RXs we've seen. And I imagine the stability of the car would be
    better than the SUV as well, both for turns and crosswinds. But the RX
    would be newer/less mileage, and could occasionally accomodate
    oversized cargo.

    I'd appreciate any advice, specifically:

    Which would you rather spend 10 hours on the freeway in?

    Which would you expect to last longer?

    Thanks!
    Owen

  2. #2
    msb
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    Based on the last 2 questions the LS400 is definitly the better car.

    Myles

    Owen Strawn wrote: 



  3. #3
    Pete
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    The LS is a long-range cruiser without peer. I drive mine from KS to FL
    and back routinely, 1430 miles in two days, and at the end of the trip I
    don't feel beat up or totally drained. It's just superb on either the
    interstate or older 2-lanes. The comfort, silence, smoothness, power,
    and precise roadworthiness are worth the cost. My LS typically averages
    about 26 mpg over long hauls at fairly brisk cruise speeds.

    The Lexus V-8 was a reputation for long life. So does the LS. LS's
    typically run 240,000 to 320,000 miles before needing major attention.

    -- Pete


    Owen Strawn wrote: 


  4. #4
    Owen
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    Thanks for the replies! Can anybody give me specific comparisons, I
    fear the LS may be too much car for us, but if the higher position of
    the RX isn't really an advantage...

    PS. I am in Wichita, with family in FL, WI, CA, and WA. So far I've
    only made the drive to WI, can't imagine going farther without a
    better car.

    Pete <com> wrote in message news:<YZiDc.15296$rh.2636@okepread02>... 

  5. #5
    Rlstockman
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    I have a 2000 RX-300, my trade-in was an 1997 ES300. Both cars are great long
    distance cruisers, both allow a day of driving without tiring you out. The RX
    is more comfortable to drive because it has superior visibility. Being in
    amongst a flock of SUV's and other tall vehicles in the ES300 (or any sedan)
    was hectic due to limited ability to see around or thru them. With the RX300
    you can see everything. It took about 1,000 miles to become accustomed to the
    higher seating position in the RX300 and after that it becomes just a very
    roomy sedan.

    Crosswinds are no more noticable than in a slabsided rental sedan.

    The amenities, CD changer, sunroof, sounds system and cruisecontrol are great.
    The factory tires were lousey in the wet but a set of Michelin CrossTerrains
    from TireRack corrected that.

    Go with the RX300, you'll not regret it!

    Bob in Atlanta

  6. #6
    Bob
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    On 29 Jun 2004 05:03:04 GMT, com (Rlstockman) wrote:
     
    I will respectfully disagree. We have a 2004 ES330. It is the great
    cruiser as mentioned above. I have driven RX 300's and 330's when
    getting service work done and am always shocked that people pay the
    money for those. The refinement is gone. Yes, it looks like a Lexus
    inside and out and it does have the higher seating position, (but not
    as high as our suburban). But when you start down the road you could
    begin to think you were in a chevy blazer or something much less than
    $42000. Compared to the ES, it is not as quiet, or smooth, or
    directionally stable. Another problem I have is that the seats don't
    seem to hold me in place quite as well either. I also don't think it
    has as much room inside. I am sure someone has measurements for it
    but when I drive the RX, I always end up resting my arm on the
    PASSENGER arm rest. I am 6'4 but I fit comfortably in the ES. I am
    confident that all the differences I have mentioned between the RX and
    ES are more profound if comparing the RX to a big LS sedan.

    Bob in Augusta

  7. #7
    canadalexus
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    Until recently, I had both a 2001 GS-430 and a 2001 RX-300. I
    previously had a 97 ES-300. I recently returned the GS when the lease
    came up, and kept the RX. As noted above, the RX has a great driving
    position. I find it very smooth and a joy to drive. Perhaps a bit
    under-powered (I was spoiled by the GS). It is great in the snow too.
    I would definitely buy one again--when the hybrid comes out.

  8. #8
    Owen
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    Well, I haven't driven any of them yet, but I was able to check out a
    97 ES300, 98 LS400, 99 RX300, 00 SC300, and a new RX330 at the local
    car lots. The ES that we saw seemed to be far less luxurious than any
    of the others - maybe it was a poor example of the breed but all the
    other cars seemed much nicer to me, even the RX300 which I expected to
    be equipped much the same as an ES.

    Thanks for the input!
    Owen

    Bob Muse <spam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:<com>... 

  9. #9
    ag
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    LS400 definitely. If you don't need the four wheel drive, the LS is an
    unbelievable car. I have the ls430 for my wife's car and it drives like a
    dream on long distance trips.


    "Owen Strawn" <com> wrote in message
    news:google.com... 
    news:<com>... 
    great long 
    The RX 
    in 
    sedan) 
    RX300 
    to the 
    very 
    great. 
    CrossTerrains 



  10. #10
    The
    Guest

    Re: LS400 vs RX300

    I'll agree with the putting your arm on the passenger armrest...I do just
    that, but for a long haul from chicago to memphis...it was a very
    pleasurable drive...even over the rough I-55 in Arkansas! ...2004 RX-330 w/
    everything exc. nav, and multipart sunroof
    "ag" <net> wrote in message
    news:MR6Fc.5269$news.prodigy.com... 
    out. 
    Being 
    the 
    accustomed 
    are 




 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48