Mercedes-Benz: Israeli Butchers blow face off American

"Harry" <com> wrote in
news:bnoukl$kbf$btinternet.com:
 

How is preventing that, to the tune of $100,000,000,000.00 in tax money,
a Constitutional function of the United States government? Israel
provides the United States ZERO benefits, they've been convicted of
spying on us (the Pollard case was described by Caspar Weinberger as the
most severe imaginable threat to American national security), and they
deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, killing 34 and injuring nearly
200.
 

And what is Israel doing to protect the United States from "radical
Islam"? Answer: nothing. Israeli spies tracked most of the September
11th hijackers, but did not share any of their findings with US
intelligence.
 

A lie spread by Sixty Minutes - neither the word "virgin" nor any
derivative thereof is found in the Qu'ran.
 

http://www.whowillsavethechildren.org/remember2000.html

478 Palestinian children killed by Israel.
 

The Palestinians have been doing so for 36 years, courtesy of Israel and
the United States.
 

Again, where is the Constitutional mandate for the United States to
fleece its taxpayers to support ANY other nation (not necessarily
Israel)? Please provide Article and Section.

These assholes are just rabid anti-semites!

They twist and turn with all their left-wing journalist friends.

Take for example targeted assassinations, like the first lightning strike in
the recent war against Saddam Hussein, which was followed up with more
targeted strikes against Saddam, his sons, and others such as "Chemical
Ali." These hits were hailed as masterstroke by the media. U.S. leaders said
that they were instrumental in shortening the war.

On the other hand, when Israel pursues terrorist leaders with targeted
strikes, they are criticized by the world community as excessive and
provocative. That is because Exception #1 of World Politics states: Targeted
killings of terrorists are okay, except when the terrorist is killing Jews.

Civilian casualties? 2 months ago, the Associated Press reported there were
over 3,200 civilian deaths in the recent Iraq war. The United States
government says as much as they have tried, civilian deaths are unavoidable
because the Iraqi military is breaking the rules of Geneva Convention by
deploying in civilian areas.

It was just a year ago that an Israeli Air Force jet dropped a bomb on a
Gaza apartment building housing Salah Shehadeh, the commander of Hamas who
had ordered scores of terrorist acts. In the bombing, 15 civilians perished.

Israel was severely rebuked.

Obviously the IDF never read Exception #2 of World Politics:

Civilian deaths are to be avoided, but cannot be criticized when the enemy
is using civilians as human shields... except when you are targeting someone
who is killing Jews.

There is another rule which relates to terrorism. Everyone knows that
September 11 was terrorism, that the Bali nightclub was terror, that the
airline shoe bomber was a terrorist. Terrorism is defined as "intentionally
targeting civilians to advance a political cause." Simple, right?

But open up you local paper and see how perpetrators of the following
attacks are described: bus bombing in Jerusalem, Seder massacre in Netanya,
Bat Mitzvah shooting in Hadera, shopping mall bombing in Haifa.

Instead of "terror," the media uses terms like "militant" and "activist."

Which brings us to Exception #3 of World Politics: Do not hesitate to call
terrorists "terrorists" -- except when they're targeting Jews.

And then there's the whole issue of eliminating terror from our global
landscape. After September 11, President Bush declared war on terrorists and
"all who harbour them." The issue is black and white. There is no
negotiating with terrorists. After the recent terror attacks in Saudi
Arabia, Vice President Cheney declared, "The only way to deal with this
threat ultimately is to destroy it. There's no treaty that can solve this
problem.

There's no peace agreement, no policy of containment or deterrence that
works to deal with this threat. We have to go find the terrorists."

Throughout the 1990s, Yasser Arafat enjoyed full immunity, despite not
arresting terrorists, stopping funding or confiscating weapons. Under his
watchful eye (and often with his signature), Palestinian terror groups
organized, trained, armed -- and killed hundreds. And now as the road map
continues to fall apart, the Palestinian Prime Minister has declared that
he will not forcibly disarm Hamas, preferring instead to work with them so
that they agree to go along (temporarily) with the diplomatic route.

Recently, faced with 53 separate terror alerts in ONE WEEK, Israel finally
decided to take out Hamas co-founder and terror chief Abdel Aziz Rantisi.

After the missile strike (which Rantisi narrowly escaped), world
condemnation of the IDF was resounding; President Bush called Israel's
action "troubling."

It highlighted Exception #4 of World Politics: Weed out and fight terrorism
wherever you may find it... except if the terrorists are targeting Jews.

Without knowing these basic exceptions to the rules of world politics, how
can anyone make sense of the Mideast situation?

Unless of course, you add into the equation, the centuries old perversity of
hating the Jew, and the blood libel.


"Awake" <Comment.Header> wrote in message
newsrg...