+ Reply to Thread
Page 49 of 250 FirstFirst ... 39 47 48 49 50 51 59 99 149 ... LastLast
Results 481 to 490 of 2491

Chrysler: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

  1. #481
    Ted
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers


    "Dave C." <com> wrote in message
    news:70llb.585$news.pas.earthlink.net... 
    you 
    seriously 

    I do, and I find that a minivan is a lot more useful in hauling their little
    butts around. (or rather, my wife does since she drives it)

    And I grew up in a family that ran station wagons until we were in
    high school and could drive ourselves. And on top of that I happen to
    own one. (a station wagon). It's not a daily driver, it's purpose is
    a backup car in case the van craps out and I have it up on jackstands
    for a couple days. My daily driver (right now) is an econobox, due to
    the amount of miles I accumulate a week.

    So pardon but I think I have a pretty good idea of what would happen
    if an attempt was made to convince SUV (and minivan) owners to
    go to station wagons.

    Ted



  2. #482
    Ted
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers


    "Aardwolf" <com> wrote in message
    news:com... 
    they're 
    the 
    they 
    suddently 
    trucks 
    always 

    You cannot substitute "styling" for interior leg and head room. You have to
    go
    back to the early 70's like a 73 T-Bird or a Old 98 before you can find a
    sedan that could actually fit 4 adults comfortably. Sure, if automakers
    started
    producing such vehicles again, you might knock off a few SUVs that were
    bought to haul adults around, but the people that bought SUV's for real
    hauling aren't going to go to a wagon, and the people that bought them to
    haul
    families aren't going to go to a wagon either (although they would have
    been
    a lot smarter to have bought either a minivan or a full size van, IMHO)
    and the posers that bought them to pretend they are offroaders in the
    city aren't going to go to a sedan either.

    Where station wagons shine is if you have ONE driver that regularly
    has a need of hauling small to mid size delivery. For example the
    admin that needs to drive a computer across town, the wife that
    likes going to the rummage sales on the weekend, the janitor
    who has to haul cleaning supplies to a building, the construction
    foreman who goes to a couple job sites, and a smattering
    of service guys who don't need to carry ladders or large tools.

    Ted



  3. #483
    Dori
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    Well, chaps, that's a timely note (about the Monaro). In last week's Sunday
    Times, the UK's biggest selling quality Sunday paper, there was an item
    about the Monaro and how it's going to become the Pontiac GTO.

    Note that it was described as being of "old design, a relative of the Omega
    saloon which disappeared from the price lists earlier this year...coming to
    Britain [as] Vauxhall as a by-product of the decision to launch it in the
    US...

    "...GM sought a modern equivalent of its GTO and found this potent coupe
    lurking at its Australian outpost. The Vauxhall Monaro will have the same
    specs as the new GTO...5.7 litre engine V8... and six-speed manual gearbox
    from the Chevrolet Corvette it is loud and fast (0 - 60 mph in 5.5 sec), yet
    more civilised than its American predecessor, the Pontiac Firebird. At
    present there is nothing quite like the Monaro available in Britain."

    Price is GBP 32K for the 360 bhp LSI. The 320 bhp CV8 will cost about GBP
    28 000.

    "Coupes of equivalent size and performance are much more expensive --
    ....Merc CL and forthcoming BMW 6...Vauxhall led the UK car market with the
    Corsa [note: a small car]. Whether it has raised its reputation enough to
    sell a GPB 30K high-performance model remains to be seen."

    Just in case you don't all know, Vauxhall is GM's brand. I wonder if it
    will be launched on the Continent (as an Opel).

    I guess the Monaro will sit in a separate market niche as Saab is supposed
    to be up-market from Vauxhall/Opel. Saab cars are not that big though. The
    most powerful engine is a 2.3 l turbo achieving 220 or 250 hp.


    An additional point is in connection with criticisms elsewhere of designs
    being 'pinched'. The big producers are global and would be foolish not to
    pick designs from all over the place. That said, I am not sure that the US
    companies 'pinch' enough from their overseas affiliates.


    DAS
    ---
    NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
    ---
    "rnf2" <ac.nz> wrote in message
    news:iconz.co.nz... 
    reliable 
    wagons. 
    the 
    any 
    Monaro 
    GM-U.S. 
    family 
    still 
    "Chevrolet 
    to 



  4. #484
    Bill
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers



    Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: 

    I did no such bitching. Re-read my post. There are quote marks around
    the comments you are talking about - as in, that is what the liberals
    would say if attempts were made to keep bad drivers off the roads
    (paraphrasing the arguments they have made in the past about why
    rewarding irresponsible people for pumping out babies, i.e., the career
    welfare moms, had to continue). Some of your other comments in this
    thread also make no sense in regards to anything I posted - maybe due to
    the same mis-reading of what I posted.

    Bill Putney
    (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with "x")


    -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
    -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

  5. #485
    Dori
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    You need another product from the DC Group:

    http://www.mercedes-benz.com/omb/d/ecars/unimog/u3000u4000.htm

    DAS
    --
    ---
    NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
    ---
    "rnf2" <ac.nz> wrote in message
    news:iconz.co.nz... 
    .....................................




  6. #486
    Nate
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
     

    Show me some proof that my "gross generalization" is wrong.
     

    It may surprise you to learn that I've driven just about every SUV on
    the market as of a year or two ago, on a test track no less. Are you
    going to persist in calling me clueless with no proof, or are you going
    to put up or shut up?

    nate


    --
    remove "horny" from my email address to reply.


  7. #487
    Nate
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    RJ wrote:
     

    Subaru, Audi, VW, Volvo all offer all wheel drive wagons with good
    safety ratings. Besides, I have lived in several areas where a
    significant amount of annual snowfall was a normal occurrance and never
    felt unsafe even in a regular FWD compact so long as I had good tires.


    It's probably telling that when working up in the UP I made the
    observation that the only people driving trucks and/or SUVs were either
    engineers testing same or else people towing snowmobile trailers. Most
    of the locals just drove cheap old econobeaters.

    nate

    --
    remove "horny" from my email address to reply.


  8. #488
    Nate
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    RJ wrote:
     

    That's not the fault of "passenger cars" per se, it's the fault of CAFE
    which has killed the full sized car as we once knew it.

    I don't particularly feel that 4x4 is a requirement (see previous post)

    nate

    --
    remove "horny" from my email address to reply.


  9. #489
    rnf2
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    The Mog's a great off roader, I've ridden in them during my years as a
    cadet, the army can drive them all over the landscape where a Landrover or
    other SUV cannot go.

    yet even they can become civilised. I've seen them on lowered suspensions
    with a campervan body on the back. even with the lowering they can outdo
    SUVs.

    rhys

    "Dori Schmetterling" <co.uk> wrote in message
    news:3f9653a7$0$586$dial.pipex.com... 
    loads 
    int 
    clubs 
    neglegible 



  10. #490
    rnf2
    Guest

    Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers

    The Commadore is a very nice car to drive, My mother, (A farmer) drives a V6
    3.8L '89 commadore sedan, It will go up steep hills without shifting down,
    and cruises in overdrive at 100Kmh (60Mph) at 2500 rpm.
    I've never actually put it through it's paces properly, most cars I drive I
    take to a deserted flat stretch of road 4 or so Km long and floor them. my
    2L nissan could do 130Kmh before complaining, and could head up the highway
    comfortably in cruise control at 120. My Isuzu Bighorn 2.8 Diesel could
    manage 145Kmh and runs up the motorway at 140.
    I floored my mums commodore and passed 180 and still accellerating when I
    had to brake for a corner. so theres power to spare.
    The police use 3.8 holdens as chase cars and highway patrol, with an
    aftermarket ECU chip giving max speeds in the 250Kmh range.

    Think of what a 5.7L V6 could do. amd the monaro body is lighter than the
    '89 Commodores. more power, less weight, more tire grip (265/30R18 on the
    monaro, 195/70R15 on the Commadore.) adds up to a pretty damn potent
    vehicle.

    rhys

    "Dori Schmetterling" <co.uk> wrote in message
    news:3f964eef$0$592$dial.pipex.com... 
    Sunday 
    Omega 
    to 
    yet 
    The 
    US 
    350ci. 
    and 
    5.7L 
    they 
    other 
    even 
    easily 
    doubtless 
    350 
    had 
    that 
    counter 
    Commodore 
    the 




 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48