Infiniti: How are these Japanese luxury brands doing these days?

<com> wrote...
 

You could accept what comes your way via Usenet - and do the copious math
yourself, or Google a few of the more well-respected purveyors of customer
satisfaction, such as:

http://www.jdpower.com/autos

-BH-

Lexus is the top selling luxury brand in the US and continues to gain
market share. Acura's TSX has the highest resale value in it's class.

Those who are seeking the hottest/trendiest/flashiest vehicle and plan
to get ride of it by the time the warranty is over are still fawning
over European brands, but other than that bunch the market continues to
trend heavily towards the Japanese brands. Infiniti seems to be the one
Japanese brand which is chasing the trendy crowd.

John

Lexus has the highest sales in the US, higher than any other luxury
car maker, but in Europe people don't tend to like Lexus. It's hard to
know why, but in Europe automotive tastes seem to differ
significantly. E.g. virtually everyone in Continental Europe drives
with manual transmission and if you don't people look down on you. In
America most drive automatics. Lexuses tend to be more reliable and
refined than other luxury cars, so perhaps the difference in sales
reflect American consumers' utilitarianism and individualism versus
the European consumers' snobbery.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexus

On 22 Mar 2007 22:33:49 -0700, com wrote:
 

I saw an article that says Lexus is going to introduce some super-lux
models so yes, they seem to agree with your basic observation.

Acura, just doesn't seem to care, they make money on what they have
even without an NSX for image, but really what did the NSX ever do for
TL sales?

I still wish Honda/Acura would put out some V8 vehicles, but the RL
body is probably just a little tight for it, and the cost of building
on a new body is too high. They'd probably sell some in SUV bodies,
but high powered FWD utilities vehicles wouldn't shock or awe anybody.
But hey, an S4000 (or Acura badge whatever) to go against the X8 ...

.... would harsh their fleet mileage, too.

J.

On Mar 23, 1:33 am, com wrote: 

Don't know your age group, but when I was a kid in the fifties, an
Oldsmobile super 88 was the supercar, way before the Pontiac
Bonneville appeared on the scene. Why? Because it performed close to
a muscle car of the sixties, otherwise the drive train was identical
to a Chevy's.... would I buy a supercar today, yes, I would opt for a
Mercedes, had two in fact before my Lexus GS300.... why did I pick
Lexus or rather Japanese over the Germans, because (1) Everything was
included essentially in one package, no funky long list of options
especially like on a GM or BMW product, also (2) Going back to the
dealer is expensive, and Japanese cars essentially are change the oil
and rotate the tires... if you need a (3) Higher resale value, which
may be moot when talking about the Germans, but certainly a propos
when thinking of a domestic product...

/N.

Lexus is a great disappointment if you have ever driven a Mercedes. It
is a noisy, rough, small car engineered for show, not go. It is not
even civilized. It is just not a luxury car. But it is about 30,000
cheaper than a Mercedes which accounts for its popularity. The thing
that got me to buy one was that my wife has had two of the mini-ES
cars and they have not needed much repair. The first one, a 1993, blew
its tranny which was normal for that year. The second one has rotten
brakes, but so does my crappy LS430. The Mercedeses needed constant
repair. Every 3 years they stranded me beside the road. But the Lexus
needs constant oil and service - every 5000 miles. And then some
little motor burns out or something, so you go to the stealership just
as often as with a Mercedes. Am probably going back to the Mercedes
and buy a little dodge neon to put in the trunk or something. At least
the Mercedes is engineered for go and it does go when it isn't broken.
And the Mercedes is comfortable and logical and does not have blind
spots engineered in.

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:54:57 GMT, John Horner <com>
wrote:
 

Maybe that's why the lease pricing has gotten better since
introduction, a good record is probably worth $10/20 per month.

J.

JXStern wrote:
 


I doubt we will ever see V-8 powered Hondas. Honda's view seems to be
that the V-6 is all the motor any street car ever will need. Remember
that Honda is led first and foremost by engineers, everyone else is
supporting cast. The engineers see a future where more fuel efficiency
is needed and don't see any reason to make bigger more fuel thirst
engines. They really don't care that this means ignoring certain market
segments. Toyota and Honda obviously have different operating
principles. Toyota is focused on the mission to provide a vehicle for
every purse and purpose, as Alfred Sloan of GM's great years famously
said. Honda is a rifle shot competitor which takes as it's prime
directive "being a company society wants to have exist". Honda thus
puts it's speculative money and effort into small jet airplane
development and robot development while Honda's products are rifle shots
at particular market segments. It is interesting that in Japan Honda is
now the #2 automaker behind Toyota after unseating Nissan from that
spot. Considering that when Honda first moved up from motorcycles to
automobiles the Japanese government tried to stop them this is a very
interesting development. Also, Honda has far fewer base designs and
models than does Toyota. Basically Honda has the Civic platform, the
Accord platform, the Odyssey platform, the Fit platform. It is truly
stunning how many successful products they spin out of those.