+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Ford Explorer: going to buy a new (for me) Explorer questions

  1. #1
    LCC
    Guest

    going to buy a new (for me) Explorer questions

    OK all
    After thinking over my ongoing problem with the flexplate on my '93 XLT,
    I have decided to go for broke and replace it with a newer version. I have
    some questions from newer model owners that I hope you can answer.

    I'm looking at 2001 XLT's (or above if they fit my budget)
    I also am considering 4WD (no snow, but moderate off road trips a couple
    times a year)


    The 4.0 SOHC V6 looks like a better deal for this vehicle. Cheaper initial
    costs, better mileage and respectable hp. Does anyone have any gripes about
    this engine/tranny combo?

    How much of a hit in overall cost of driving and maintaining is the 4WD
    option? What kind of around town mileage?

    Anything in particular to watch out for in this model year Explorer?

    Any "got to have" options? (trailer/tow package comes to mind)

    Thanks to all for you input.

    Larry



  2. #2
    rayfox
    Guest

    Re: going to buy a new (for me) Explorer questions

    Look at some of the threads on "gas mileage"

    IMO the 1 or 2 mpg difference in the 2 motors isn't worth it to me. I
    would rather have the HP, and torque of the V8, for the minscule trade off
    in mileage.

    It's like the 6 gets crappy mileage, and the 8 gets a *little* crappier
    mileage....


    "LCC" <net> wrote in message
    news:3cHib.63409$.. 
    XLT, 
    about 



  3. #3
    AZGuy
    Guest

    Re: going to buy a new (for me) Explorer questions

    In addition to which the OHC V6 has caused lots of grief to owners due
    to various timing chain/tensioner issues. The 5.0 is rock solid. The
    only reason to get the V6 would be if you had to get it to get the
    kind of 4x4 system you wanted.

    On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:28:21 -0700, "rayfox" <org> wrote:
     


  4. #4
    JaWise
    Guest

    Re: going to buy a new (for me) Explorer questions

    >The 4.0 SOHC V6 looks like a better deal for this vehicle. Cheaper initial 

    I had a 99 mountaineer with the 5.0, a 97 with the SOHC and now have a 2002
    with the SOHC.

    I prefer the 4.0. The only problem I had with the 4.0 was the cam tensioner
    recall on the 97.

    With the 4.0 I average about 16 mpg. With the v8 I averaged 14 mpg. It
    doesn't sound like much but when you figure a 20 gallon tank thats 40 miles
    less per Tank. Besides the money it just means you have a very short driving
    range between fillups.

    My v8 was also starting to have problems with knocking before I traded it in.
    In the newsgroups I found some other people with the problem.

    The v8 has All Wheel Drive=no low range.


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48