Ford: Focus - need info pretty quick
-
Focus - need info pretty quick
Hey all,
I just recently (tonight) drove a Focus and I absolutely LOVED it. I
know about all the recalls and all, but the family member's who've had
Fords before have all had EXCELLENT service.
This post, however, is about gas mileage. The focus is listed as 16/35,
and my biggest concern is excellent gas mileage -- mostly in the city.
Nope, 16mpg doesn't quite excite me.
I wanted to hear back from Focus owners (please) on your experiences with
the mileage you're getting, as well as any other opinons you may have.
I'll be making my decision this weekend.
Take care, and feel free to email me!
Jon
com
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
"Jon Patrick" <com> wrote in message
news:77.188.17...
Pretty sure that should be 26/35.
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
The EPA CAFE guide list the following for the '03 Focus
www.fueleconomy.gov
A-4 2V at 27/33
A-4 4V at 25/31
M-5 2V at 27/36
M-5 4V at 26/34
mike hunt
Stephan Mynarkiewicz wrote:
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
Thanks for the info, I didn't know about fueleconomy.gov..
However, I was wondering if, from other *owners*, whether the EPA
estimates are reasonable in the real world.
Thanks again.
Jon
com wrote in news:com:
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
I had a 2000 ZX3 5 spd. The lowest I've ever gotten was 28mpg. I'd usually
get 29-32 range. On a couple highway trips it hit 36 in both cases. The 2000
had the bulk of the recalls and the 2001 had some. The 2002 and 2003 had no
recalls, I think. Some 04s get a Duratec 2.3L engine with similar mpg, low
emissions and more horsepower.
I did not have any problems outside of the recalls. I traded it in six weeks
ago because I wanted a Mustang GT.
John
"Jon Patrick" <com> wrote in message
news:77.188.17...
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
In article <77.188.16>,
com says...
There are way too many variables to give you a good guess. Depends on
how you drive, terrain, traffic, etc. I'd recommend you look up the
economy numbers for your current vehicle, and compare it to what you are
getting. Your Focus would get roughly the same percentage higher or
lower as your current car. <Insert Massive Disclaimer here>
Of course, since the Focus is probably in much better tune, I'd call
that guess a minimum.
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
Jon Patrick wrote:
I'd honestly consdier a Civic, Neon, or Sentra before a Focus.
As for the 15 mpg - that's a typo. 25.
What gets me is the horrible and completely unuseable interior
of all Ford products. Only GM does worse. The Sentra SE-R,
otoh, is a powerful little car with great reliability AND
features. More power, better mileage, and better handling.
Civics - well, they are what they are - good little cars
with no real problems.
Not a fan of the Echo, though - feels too cheap and underpowered
for my tastes. Small as well - feels cramped inside.
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
"Joseph Oberlander" <net> wrote in > What gets me
is the horrible and completely unuseable interior
I drive a Maxima, and can vouch that the Focus interior is GREAT compared to
the competition. The vehicle as a whole has a very tight German feel to it,
very comparable to the Jetta I used to own. I regularly rent them when I go
on business trips, I wouldn't hesisitate to recommend one to a friend (I
have before). The Sentra SE-R is much more expensive than the Focus, the
cars aren't really in the same league. Unless he's talking about buying
the SVT, of course.
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
You hit the nail on the head with the how you drive, terrain,
traffic, etc. My one son owned a Focus 2dr 5 speed for his long
daily commute to work over mountainous country. He had the
opportunity to ge into a bigger car pool if he had a car that
could hold another driver/rider. He bought a Mercury Grand
Marquis V8. His average mileage only dropped 5 MPG less than
making the same trip with the 4cy engine.
mike hunt
John Alt wrote:
-
Re: Focus - need info pretty quick
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:37:17 GMT, <com> wrote:
I had a 1989 4cyl Probe (2.2L I4) with automatic, back in the early/mid
90s.. I averaged 35mpg on the interstate, and 30mpg everyday driving... I
lived in "the boonies" then, but I was also a teen and drove like one..
hard. I also had a '91 Mazda MX-6 (same engine as the probe, but was a
5speed manual) a few years later, I used it on a paper route for about 2
years, and got about 25-30mpg on the route (just over 75miles a night, stop
and go the whole way..)
Then, when it burned (literally..) I bought the Taurus (3.8L V6, auto)..
and it only got about 10-15mpg on the paper route. Which is lower than the
EPA's indications.
Now, the Taurus averages around 20mpg in everyday driving since leaving the
paper back in 2001, which is closer to the EPAs.. It would probably get
better mileage if the tranny wasn't basically shot, and the rear end wasn't
warped.. (thats what happens when ya get sideswiped by an uninsured
motorist.. only had liability... oh well. :/ )
Chuck
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules