Ferrari: Ferrari of choice
-
Ferrari of choice
Took a 16 mile test ride in a 1987 328 GTS that was very well kept up by the
owner, and my Ferrarri Mechanic friend.
I have previously test driven a 308, drove a friends 512 Berlinetta Boxer, a
1990 Testarossa, and now a very nice 328 GTS.
As I drove the GTS, after my Viper, and then C5 Vette, it took a while to
get used to the smaller interior dimensions, and the appreviated view out
the rear window. It took no time at all to get used to the easy view over
the fenders, the smaller exterior dimensions, or the nice way the gear shift
fell to hand. The wheel well was canted more than my former Viper, and the
brakes seemed old technology. But it was a fun car to drive.
Upon my return, my buddy suggested that I might like to try a 1992 512 TR
that one of his clients is selling. It has a Tubi exhaust, but is otherwise
basically stock. I took the same 16 mile route.
The increase in horsepower and torque over the 1990 Testarossa that I drove
is noticeable. The difference between the 92 TR 512 and the 328 GTS was
night and day. The center of gravity is lower, and the interior of the 512
TR is gorgeous. It is comfortable, non-claustrophobic, and at 5000 rpms in
second gear with the windows down, the sound and the "push" in the back is
second to none.
A bit scary on wet roads on the turns. A LOT of weight moving laterally.
But FUN!!
So I will be saving my nickels and dimes. I now know which Ferrari I will
be saving for.
Thank you all for answering my prior questions and giving me feedback on the
different marques. If and when any of you see any "deals" come up on a 92
or 93 512 TR (not the 512M, or the earlier Testarossa) I would enjoy
knowing about them, starting around June of this coming year.
Regards,
Larry
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
"LIW" <net> wrote in message
news:sjmBd.12975$..
the
a
over
shift
the
otherwise
drove
512
in
the
92
Congrats on finally making your choice Larry!
Despite many people (including several on here whom I
am friends with) disliking Testarossas I have always liked
the 512 TR. Naples Motorsports had a particularly stunning
example in a gorgeous light blue that I fell in love with. A
blue TR doesn't sound particularly appealing, I know, but this
color combination was just beautiful. I still really like the TR's
edgy lines, the only parts that bother me are the motorized belts
and the slatted taillights. Those aside, I'm a huge fan.
Good luck in your search.
-Matt- "..."
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
"matt borland" <rr.com> wrote in message
news:1wnBd.23$columbus.rr.com...
Boxer,
to
out
TR
rpms
is
laterally.
will
Thank you, Matt. You were instrumental on refocusing me to my personal
tastes, which clearly run toward horsepower and torque.
Plus, truth be told, that was the direction I had been looking for the past
year or two anyway. It is nice to have it narrowed down.
Best regards and Happy New Year to You and Yours.
Larry
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
<<So I will be saving my nickels and dimes. I now know which Ferrari I will be
saving for.>>
Woo hoo! Good luck in your quest to find *your* Ferrari.
C.
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
"TigerRace1" <com> wrote in message
news:aol.com...
will be
Thank you. I'm waiting to hear whether the current owner of the 92 512TR
that I test drove is interested in hanging onto it until June or July at an
agreed upon price. His price is high, but it does seem to be in excellent
shape. The only down side to this car is that the original owner, Ronnie
Lott put his football number in script on the left rear deck. It's fairly
tasteful in very small script, and the current owner, a CEO of a major
Silicon Valley company has seen fit to live with it for almost ten years.
I'd still rather not have it on there, as the short term celebrity status
doesn't matter to me.
Any opinions on how much this painted addition lowers the value of a 92 512
TR, if it does?
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
"LIW" <net> wrote in message
news:mPnCd.23045$..
an
512
I don't think it'd lower the value (sorry). Actually, to the
right person it'd help the deal go through, as he was a
good player back then. I'd leave it there as part of the
car's history. Consider it part of the patina.
I once had a 924S with a hideous, and enormous, graphic
equalizer that was mounted on a hideaway stalk alongside
the console. I had no idea it was there and then one day
my friend mutters "what the hell is this?" and pulls up this
EQ that, once unfolded, looked like the shifter in one of
Ed Roth's "Rat Fink" illustrations. The thing swiveled
up to eye level!
I left it there, tucked away (it didn't work, just lit up) and
after I'd sold it I told the next guy as he was getting ready
to drive away that he should spend some time looking
around the car, as there was a unique piece of audio
equipment installed that was quite hilarious. He looked
intrigued as he left, and I'm sure once he found it he got
a good laugh. I figure half the joy of owning a used car
is the little discoveries like that that tell you about the car's
history. I've found some interesting little surprises in pretty
much every car I've bought used, provided the car was
10 years old or more.
My $.02....
-Matt- "..."
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
<<I'd still rather not have it on there, as the short term celebrity status
doesn't matter to me.
Any opinions on how much this painted addition lowers the value of a 92 512
TR, if it does?>>
Do you mean that the *status* of owning an ex-Lott car means nothing to you or
that Lott's celebrity status is short-term? He's considered one of the greatest
football players of all time and sounds like a decent guy. I wouldn't pay extra
to own his car or have his signature added to mine, but I don't think it
detracts from its value any and I'm sure that some football lover out there
would pay extra for the provenance.
My folks own one of Mario Andretti's old cars, a Dino. His name is on the
driver's door. We don't know who put it there. I had Clay Regazzoni sign the
dash in my Mondial when he came to our shop with the technicians to install
hand controls in it and then taught me how to drive with them. I wish we had
thought of having him sign the 355 F1 Challenge car when he drove that. Why?
Because he's a great guy, the memory means a lot to me and the signature is
just an extra something to remind me.
C.
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
"TigerRace1" <com> wrote in message
news:aol.com...
status
512
you or
greatest
extra
there
the
install
had
Why?
is
I meant that Ronnie Lott only owned the car for a short period of time, and
that it has primarily been owned over the years by the former head of Seibel
systems. I should have said, the short period of time the vehicle was
owned by a celebrity didn't matter to me. Ronnie was a starter at many runs
favoring charities that I ran in over the years, and he was always
approachable, helpful, and has been a great asset to the Bay area, as well
as to the sport of football, and many local charities. But having his
number on the car seems a bit phony, if I'm driving the car, as though I'm
saying that there is some connection between Ronnie Lott and myself, when,
in fact he wouldn't know me in a room of two.
That having been said, I like Matt's comment that things like this add to
the "patina" of the vehicle, and I'm satisfied with that. Now I need to
find out if I'm going to become the vehicle's owner.
I have a line on an 89 that I could afford now, but I like the TR better
than the Testarossa. Not sure if I'm splitting hairs here for tens of
thousands of dollars or not.
Thanks for the input.
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
<<I like Matt's comment that things like this add to the "patina" of the
vehicle, and I'm satisfied with that.>>
Cool. I agree with that as well, so we must be right. <g>
<<I have a line on an 89 that I could afford now, but I like the TR better than
the Testarossa. Not sure if I'm splitting hairs here for tens of thousands of
dollars or not.>>
If you can afford to have what you want, then get what you want. I would never
advise anyone going into debt to own a dream car, but if you've worked hard to
get there, then don't shortchange yourself.
C.
-
Re: Ferrari of choice
LIW wrote:
Congrats, Larry. That's one of my favorite Ferraris - although if you
could up the ante and get the F512M I think you'd see an even greater
level of refinement and performance. But the 512 TR is light years
ahead of the previous TR models!
I owe ya an "e" or two - still getting my shit back together after
fleeing Cali. Will be in touch - vey interested in discussing that TW
article with you.
MC
--
I rode a tank
Held a general’s rank
When the blitzkrieg raged
And the bodies stank
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules