Ford Mustang: Dumass car makers!!
-
Dumass car makers!!
Freakin' activists are at it again...
http://www.safetyforum.com/powerwindows/
The power window doing Darwin's dirty work could be fixed easily and WITHOUT
auto-reverse*.
All they have to do is adapt the Pull-up-to-raise type switches like MAzda
and Mitsubishi's ... in fact Ford seems to have had them on a few past
models.
WHY does Ford keep letting this stuff go on until they have to spend big
money?
I can hear it now...
"Uh... if we put them in now, we might set ourselves up for litigation on
previous models citing defacto admission of dangerous features previously
installed."
That being the lawyers, of course; they'd rather let it ride and get the BIG
litigation bucks later.
* imagine the window probs on older cars if they had ANY kind of auto-
reverse!
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
How are you going to fix the problem of all the young children that have there
hands pinched by the closing doors? That's been going on long before the advent
of motorized windows.
"Backyard Mechanic" <com> wrote in message
news:168.3.44...
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
Thomas Moats opined in news:com:
And not just kids....
But that's where intuitive learning and Darwin rules come in.
Point being the automakers need to be picking their battles... it's stupid to
not be proactive on the switches.
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
So a door you need to learn to teach your children to keep hands out, but a
power window is the manufactures fault? Kind of faulty reasoning. Or am I
missing your point?
"Backyard Mechanic" <com> wrote in message
news:168.3.44...
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
I don't like gizmos like that anyway, but I think those dumbass tree-huggers
need a good shooting in the face.
"Backyard Mechanic" <com> wrote in message
news:168.3.44...
WITHOUT
BIG
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
Thomas Moats opined in news:com:
Well, sorta... the complaint is that 3-5 year olds were leaning out windows
and putting knees on the window switches and strangling themselves..
Dont ask me why the keys were left on
The switch being easy to modify as per the Mitsu (pull up) type.. it's stupid
to keep the rocker type.
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:39:20 GMT, net (Mike R)
wrote:
never...ever...understimate the ingenuity of complete morons....For
every way that you can think of how something can be screwed up..they
will find of 10 more ways you didn't.....
Other words..fool proof, goof proof, etc. don't exist. 
Stephan
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
at 20 Aug 2003, J Alex [info] wrote in
news:vdP0b.16523$gnilink.net:
In Europe a few years back I believe it became mandatory to have
pressure sensors on power windows just because of the kid accidents. So
the technology should be readily available. I believe the method used
is the same as the 'pressure sensitive' method used on garage door
openers. But I believe they stop rather than move back. I'd have to
call my dad and have him check his new car to see what it does...
--
_ 1995 Mustang V6 Coupe (Bright Blue)
|_| Member Modern Mustangs of North America (MMNA)
|__|rr.com http://web.tampabay.rr.com/theflock/mustang/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Handling: Upper strut brace, 17" wheels, K&N Airfilter
Styling : Mesh grill, Bullitt fuel door, aluminum gauge insert
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
The sad part is not just the people injured, but the stupid parents who are
too busy to keep an eye on their children when they're in the car. My
children are in their 30's now and neither of them was ever hurt by a
closing door or an electric window while they were living with me. Of
course, I didn't have a cell phone, pager, PDA, or notebook to distract me
when I was getting the kids ready for a trip. Of course, that's just my
opinion- I may be wrong (to quote Dennis Miller).
Tom F.
"J Alex" <info> wrote in message
news:vdP0b.16523$gnilink.net...
but
I
small
is
-
Re: Dumass car makers!!
"Tom F." <net> wrote
are
Sure, parents are ultimately responsible. But we like it if our products our
designed such that a fatality doesn't occur if we're inattentive for 4
minutes. I'd equate it to child-locks on the back doors. Just a good idea. I
don't think any engineers would disagree with the statement that designing a
product to be as low-risk as possible is good engineering.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules