+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Ford Mustang: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

  1. #1
    Hykel
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    Ok... So what do the numbers mean?
    SEE YA
    E J

  2. #2
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    That they are bricks with wheels.

    Hykel wrote: 


  3. #3
    Bob
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    They are also probably the best priced high performance you can buy for the
    buck. Bar none.



  4. #4
    JS
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    Ya don't have to convince us, Bob... that's why we're all here. Well, most
    of us anyway. ;-)

    JS

    "Bob Sacamano" <com> wrote in message
    news:AVF0b.228290$bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... 
    the 



  5. #5
    Patrick
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    com (Hykel) wrote in message news:<aol.com>...
     
     
     
     

    Just some geewiz numbers... today's trivia. (Aerodynamics is free
    horsepower.) And some people are amazed that a GT with all its "aero
    aids" is less aerodynamic than a plainer LX.

    As for being "bricks on wheels", yeah, by today's standards the Fox
    body's numbers are not very good. (But no worse than the '94-'03
    Mustangs.) Slippery cars have CDs under .30. An average for today for
    cars, I'd guess, would be in the low .3Xs... .32, .33. Trucks, SUVs,
    and vans, obviously would be much higher.

    Patrick
    '93 Cobra
    '83 LTD

  6. #6
    JS
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs


    "Patrick" <com> wrote in message
    news:google.com... 
    news:<aol.com>... 

    I'm not overly amazed. There's more nose on the front of a GT that really
    isn't scluplted that well. More flat areas for the air to want to stop
    against. The only thing I think that could help the GT over the LX hatch
    would be the spoiler... where some of the air can at least go under the
    thing.

    A few winters back I found it interesting that, when snow was left on the GT
    wing, very little of it was removed by the air in the complete center of the
    wing, and also on the outsides. I could see how the air tracked at an angle
    off of the top of the car and over the wing in two distinct paths towards
    each other.

    JS



  7. #7
    Barrett
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    At least they are faster (more aerodynamic) going forward. Remember
    the Porsche 928...It was actually faster (more aerodynamic) going
    backwards. Just a little internal humor us Porsche owners used to
    snicker about.

  8. #8
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    IMO, the 928 was one of the best looking cars ever sold. It lead the
    way for the design of many "jelly bean" cars all through the 1990's. In
    fact, many current Porsche's still have remnants of it's shape. I take
    it it wasn't a favorite among Porsche enthusiasts.

    Barrett wrote: 


  9. #9
    Joe
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    Thinking back, one of my favorite Porsches was the old Speedster.
    Sort of looked like an inflated bug on steroids. Very cool car.
    Here's a '56:

    http://volition.chooseyouritem.com/exotics/files/53500/53791-1.1956.Porsche.Speedster.html

    Joe
    Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
    Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC


    "Michael Johnson, PE" <com> wrote in
    news:com:
     


  10. #10
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: Drag Coefficients For Fox Mustangs

    I couldn't get the page too come up. The connection has been very slow
    tonight. Aside from the 914, I can't think of another Porsche I didn't
    like.

    Joe wrote:
     



 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48