Ford Mustang: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
-
Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
Interesting reading....
TOM WALSH: Detroit can believe - and win
August 29, 2003
BY TOM WALSH
FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
Enough already.
Are you tired of hearing about the fabulous Toyota production system,
the great Honda engines, the superb German engineering of Mercedes and
BMW? The unbeatable quality of Lexus?
Yeah, me too.
I don't believe for a minute that assembly line workers in Wixom or
Detroit are inferior to assembly line workers in Japan, Germany,
Georgetown, Ky., or Marysville, Ohio. And I don't believe that
engineers in Tokyo or Bavaria are smarter than engineers in Warren or
Dearborn.
But I wonder . . .
Do the hourly workers and engineers and designers at General Motors
Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group believe
their companies are as good as Toyota, Honda, Nissan and BMW?
I suspect not.
Many GM, Ford and Chrysler workers, judging from my e-mail, don't
believe they play on teams as good as their main rivals. And it's no
wonder.
I've sat in the offices of GM executives who proudly display Toyota
logo-wear as a sign of the superior performance that their own troops
should emulate.
I read in my own newspaper that Chrysler's top labor negotiator says
the southern United States factories of Toyota, Nissan, BMW and others
have superior business models.
I've watched hangdog Detroit auto executives shrug like henpecked
husbands as Wall Street analysts scold them about incentive costs and
extol the efficiencies of their competitors.
Enough already. It's time to stop with the hand-wringing and the
apologizing. It's time to go kick some butt.
This is not some jingoistic call to rally Team USA. And I mean no
disrespect to Toyota, Honda, BMW, Nissan, Mitsubishi and Hyundai.
They're entitled to play on our continent if we play on theirs.
Those companies deserve our respect. They should not, however, be
treated with reverence or held in awe.
Could the Red Wings have won those Stanley Cups if the players treated
Patrick Roy and other opposing goalies with reverence and awe? Could
the Detroit Pistons have won those 1989-90 titles by revering the
Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers as unbeatable foes?
No, of course not. In order to win, a team's coaches and players must
believe they can win. And they must talk and walk like they can win.
One company steps up
Thankfully, GM is starting to flex some butt-kicking muscle. (Forget
about Ford and Chrysler for now; Ford is only midway through a massive
restructuring and DaimlerChrysler is still in a post-merger identity
crisis).
GM leaders aren't talking or walking too boldly yet; they're like a
woozy boxer just risen from the canvas after a knockdown. But they are
no longer ashamed of themselves or their company name.
Just 13 years ago, the new Saturn brand was pitched as everything its
stodgy parent GM was not -- friendly, flexible, modern. The GM
affiliation was seen as a liability, not an asset. But that's
changing.
About three years ago, CEO Rick Wagoner started asking his own people
what the GM brand stood for. They had no clue, collectively. Since
then, GM has quietly, but rigorously, gone about forging a concept for
the corporate brand that comes down to three words: Powerful, Engaging
and Dynamic. Every vehicle GM builds should bring those words to mind.
Every TV ad, every auto show display should evoke the same words.
After Sept. 11, 2001, when the "Keep America Rolling" campaign of
no-interest loans caught the public imagination, the notion took hold
that heavier marketing use of the GM brand name could boost sales of
the individual vehicle brands.
GM won't talk about the size of its ad budget, reportedly around $200
million last year, except to say that it's growing.
From GM's 24-hour test drive ad campaign earlier this summer to the
mid-August rollout of its revamped www.gmbuypower.com Web site, the
company is clearly wielding the GM corporate brand more forcefully as
a tool to drive customers into Chevy, Cadillac and other showrooms.
After a long decline, GM has made major strides in quality improvement
and customer and dealer satisfaction. Those gains, and aggressive
rebates, helped boost GM's market share the past two years.
In a newspaper and magazine ad campaign this summer dubbed "Road to
Redemption," GM apologizes for its three decades of wandering in the
automotive wilderness and invites long-lost customers to return.
OK, we get it. Detroit's automotive leadership isn't in denial
anymore.
But enough already with the apologies. Enough already with all the
fawning praise of Toyota and the other transplants.
If GM wants to remain the world's largest automaker, if Ford and
Chrysler and the UAW want to survive and thrive, they need to talk and
walk like they believe they can win.
Patrick
'93 Cobra
'83 LTD
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
In article <com>, com wrote:
The problem with the US manufacturers is simply the management.
Management of big US corporations is simply not focused on the product.
They are focused on making their next bonus milestone.
Let me explain it this way, the manager, the guy who was promoted through
the marketing or finance ranks oversees a series of engineering managers
who were promoted to the level of their incompentence. It is very rare
for a good technical engineer to ever get beyond the rank of lead, if
he gets to that level. Now the project will have various dates that
need to be made. These will consist of internal metrics such as the
product will have it's first pilot build on a given date, pass such
and such testing on a given date etc. All internal dates that are really
meaningless since the only big one is getting the product out to the
market on time. anyway my comment aside, these managers get bonuses
or are graded on making these internal dates.
So let's say there is a design decision that has to be made. Choice
a) means fixing it right, missing the internal date but avoiding later
delays, still making the ship date, and having a better product. Choice
b) is a quick kludge. It will make the internal date but comprises the
product as whole in some shape or form.
Guess what management chooses in a big US corporation. (hint, a) doesn't
put money in any of their pockets)
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
It does but only in the longer term. And therein lies the problem. Large US
Corporations almost always focus on the short term goal to the detriment of
the longer term bigger payoff. I've often wondered if that isn't the
inherent problem that is driven by the political process which must by
necessity never focus beyond the next election date or in the case of
corporations beyond the next AGM.
--
Richard
'94 GT 'vert
Under Drive Pulleys
Transgo HD2 Reprogramming Kit
High Stall Torque Converter
4:10 Gears
Gripp Sub Frame Connectors (welded)
Laser Red
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
>
US
of
I blame the stock market for a lot of this "problem". Today's businesses is
not about make products. Its all about what the stock price is. A good (or
bad) product doesn't seem to have the meaning it use to when a company was
privately owned. With a privately owned company it better make the best
product to keep itself a float. Now if the stock value starts to drop a
company will do some BS (like laying off US workers and moving to China) to
give back wall street its warm and fuzzy feeling.
MadDAWG
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
You are exactly right. The "market" in this country demands public
companies to produce higher profits every quarter and higher stock prices to
match. This does not allow a company to fully respond to rapidly changing
customer demands or technology.
I ran a product business for 20 years and always had a long term vision. I
was always willing to forego some of today's profits to build tomorrow's
profitable products. And since this approach was very successful, I always
had the complete support of the owners.
Then through a series of buy-outs we became a large public company. I was
no longer allowed to focus on the future, only the current quarter's results
mattered. Instead of focusing on the business and actually making the
business better, I had to spend my time trying to make the quarter "look"
good. The hand writing was on the wall and I soon resigned my position as
VP. The profitable business that I once ran, lost its product focus and
died a miserable death.
LJH
95GT
"MadDAWG" <com> wrote in message
news:supernews.com...
is
(or
to
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
Well do not use the Dirtroit Dead Thiings as a example...Go Avs !
Paul
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
Patrick wrote:
Did Generic Motors come to this battle cry before or after they decided
to use *HONDA* engines in the next line of Saturn Vues. I own a Saturn
L300 for the wife, and the 3.2l V6 that is in there now (a
GM/Saturn/Opel/Saab engine) is a fine powerplant. It is also used in
the Saturn Vue. There is absolutely no excuse for importing an engine.
It's an admission that they are not *unable* to make quality parts for
the U.S., they are just unwilling.
Isn't it sad that GM produces the 5L80E transmission for BMWs with
5speed automatics? How many U.S. cars are graced with that transmission?
-
Vic
2kGT 5m blk
suspension upgrades
http://home.earthlink.net/~jthet
-
Re: Detroit Talking And Walking Like They Can Win
Victor DiMichina opined in news:com:
Excuse me! That Honda engine is built rat'cheer in Ohio.
Here's the story on it.
http://www.saturnfans.com/Cars/Future/poweredbyhonda.shtml
Yes it is... but it's probably too expensive for domestic installation.. and
since my father and two brothers, as employees of Frigidaire-then-Harrison,
built the A/C compressors for LOTS of cars OTHER than GM, I know that there
are TONS of reasons why GM might rather buy outside.
Production #'s before Quality, "Quality Circle" meetings being a joke,
millwrights NOT listening to line workers' suggestions on die setup (ran up
against THAT one myself when I worked at GM) Overinfluential Unions
protecting rights of drug dealers in plants rather than acting as an
intermediary for employees with REAL gripes...
It goes on and on.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules