Mitsubishi: CHOKE on this!

"Wickeddoll®" <com> wrote in message
news:net... 

That's it Nat. When you sense that you've lost a battle of wits (One that
you were completely unarmed for!), don't respond to the one who has
outwitted you, just talk to the air and hope that your ilk will join the
chorus! LMAO!!!

"Wickeddoll®" <com> wrote in message
news:net...
 
help 
I 
the 
Usenet. 
created 
a 
and 

Rolling eyes not withstanding, there are 10 or 11 groups this is being
posted to so I don't which one he is actually concerned with, but if the
charter for the group in question exists (and for many groups they don't)
and the charter dictates that OT posts are not allowed, then one should
desist. After all newgroups basically work on the honor system and that is
the only thing that keeps unmoderated groups effective.

I suggest he post the charter here for you to see, and then you can strike
that group from the cross-posting list. If he can't, then it would appear
you haven't done anything remotely wrong.

"Wickeddoll®" <com> wrote in message
news:net... 

Oooh! Temper, temper! 

My gosh Nat, with all your aggresive talk of "killfile me", "kill the
others", we can only hope that you don't have a pointy object in your hand!
 

Hmmm, could I buy a vowel? What the hell are you talking about? What
personal attack? Quote?
 

No Nat, I'm not the only one upset about it. I am the only one to challenge
it and that's a big difference. The rest have probably either filtered the
thread or killfiled us both. That's reality!
 

"Bradburn Fentress" <pleased@n't.spam> wrote in message
newskEDd.48$uswest.net... 
Bradburn, you are such a wuss! Take your meds now honey!

"Wickeddoll®" <com> wrote in message
news:net... 
smoker's 
smokers. 
reason 
They 
smoker's 
lot 
people 
they 
to 
of 
salt 
make 
make 

That would depend on your state's laws. I found AZ too smoky for my
likings. It would have been nice to be able to sell a million dollars in
real estate and buy an equivalent house in Phoenix with more land for
$135,000, but the idea of not being able to go to a restaurant was not my
idea of where I'd like to live. I found myself walking out of too many
restaurants right after walking in because they made no attempt to segregate
the smokers (if that's even possible.)
 
together. 
drinks 
rights 
for 

If that was true, then 2 in 3 were not smoking. There were also some
potential customers who stayed away because of the smoky atmosphere. I used
to stay away from bowling alleys for the same reason. Now I take my kids,
and kids have birthday parties there. The percentage who smoked did not
necessarily reflect the percentage of potential customers who smoked.
 
I'd 
the 
more 

The idea of the California law was not to protect the bar patrons. It was to
protect employees. I think it's still theoretically possible to open a bar
and allow smoking if the owner is the bartender and there are no employees.
(Possibly, other family members could work there.) I haven't paid much
attention to that aspect of the law since it was passed years ago, but I
wouldn't rule out the possiblity of a group of bartenders owning something
jointly and having enough owners to cover all shifts. I don't know of any
bars like that, but if I got that aspect of the law right, they would be
able to allow smoking as long as they had a sign in the entrance that says
that they allow smoking and that it's a substance known to the state of
California to cause cancer, etc.
 
lungs 

We'll have to respectfully disagree and leave it at that, then.
 
talking 
than 

This thread did start with a study that aluded to that, at least with
respect to cars. I don't know if there is comprehensive data, but I do know
that I've never come home stinking of exhaust from driving behind another
car. I've had occasions where the person in front of me is a gross polluter,
and I had to switch to recirc, but I've had far more occasions when I had to
do it because somebody in the car in front of me lit up at a red light and
had the window open.

I don't know if *I* get more toxicity from machine exhaust than from
cigarettes, but if I do, it's because I'm not around cigarettes as much. I
do know that if I were in an open room such as a garage with a car's engine
running, I'd be bothered less than if a single person were smoking. The
former would not make me cough, smell up my clothes, or give me a headache.
 
carcinogenic. 
the 
(that's 
to 

I think New England is a beautiful place. I haven't been there in a while
though.
 
people 
it. 
stand 
usually 
me 

In the 70's, I had friends whose parents smoked around them and around other
children. I can't see that happening today, and I don't know if your
parents would react the same way today either.
 
was 
part 
I 
when 
the 
day 
in 
could 
sure 
and 
of 
smelled 
to 
feel 

You could try discussing the benefits of not smoking rather than the scare
tactics and see if it works. In my case, it would be none of my business,
but as a health care worker, it would be reasonable.

"Bradburn Fentress" <pleased@n't.spam> wrote in message
newskEDd.48$uswest.net... 
Even if I had, he didn't say it in the same way you did. There is no need to
be nasty, but this guy feels there is

Natalie

"Hagrinas Mivali" <net> foolishly wrote in message
news:com... 

Whew! That's quite a statement Hag! (May I call you Hag?) AZ is a pretty big
state! You're not generalizing are you? Couldn't find a single smokefree
spot in the state! Let me tell you Hag, your opinion is really important to
us all now. You really have our attention.

P.S. I'm breaking for dinner. Please feel free to bless us with your inane
comments and I will show you how silly you are when I return. Later Dude!

"StingRay" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 

And the true troll has shown himself to be such. Hey, I know cross-posting
is a no-no, so I'm with him there, but OT posts are not a part of any of
these NGs he's ALSO cross-posting on. I'll concede to that, and will only
post to the Toyota NG after this reply (It's the only car one I'm subscribed
to anyway).

Natalie, plonking yet another twerp and moving on