+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Ford Explorer: Australia's Explorer

  1. #1
    JonnyCab®
    Guest

    Australia's Explorer

    Here are some more pictures of the Explorer Ford sells in Australia.

    Some penny-pincher at Ford should lose their job for depriving the US and
    Canada of these taillights, the *larger* molded splash guards, the
    fender-mounted repeater lights, the standard front tow hooks, and the
    floor-mounted shifter, just to name a few things that they're gladly giving
    to the Aussie market. Pinch pennies for something *other* than style.

    http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/2/web/458000-458999/458913_17.jpg

    http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/2/web/458000-458999/458913_6_full.jpg

    http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/2/web/458000-458999/458913_15_full.jpg

    http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/7/web/307000-307999/307733_57_full.jpg

    Grrr...



  2. #2
    C.
    Guest

    Re: Australia's Explorer



    "JonnyCab®" wrote:
     

    I don't think "giving" is exactly the right word. In Australia, a basic Explorer XLT
    costs $52,980 AUD, which is approximately $38,500 USD. A lot of the things you like
    probably are unimportant to US buyers. I personally don't care for the repeater
    lights (Australian legal requirement, but not a US requirement), or the taillights
    (also an Australian requirement?), or the floor shift (for an Automatic, a floor
    shift seems stupid to me). I do like the nicer mud flaps. I wonder if you could
    order those for a US model as an after market part?

    Ed



  3. #3
    JonnyCab®
    Guest

    Re: Australia's Explorer

    I am aware of the Australian requirement for repeater lights (although
    Mercury is starting to use them on all of their cars). They also do NOT
    require side reflectors, front or back (???), but the amber turn signals
    just look too cool---and they're made by Visteon (in Ohio), right next to
    the ones made for the US market. It would seem to me that maintaining ONE
    set of lights and wiring harnesses would be cheaper than several, but then
    I'm not a $400,000/year "cost analyst" (firing the cost analyst would be
    more cost-effective ...

    The Australian headlight also has an extra bulb above the high-beam, just as
    a marker (probably their version of a burned-out-headlight marker). Of
    course, we don't get that, either.

    Personally, I don't understand why Ford chose to go back to the simple
    one-bulb taillight. I don't buy the "trailer connector" argument. The
    wiring for the standard trailer is already there, as it was in the older
    Explorers that had amber signals.

    And, although I can't tolerate even LOOKING at the last of the Oldsmobile
    Bravadas (which will now live on as the butt-ugly Buick Rainier), they did
    have one thing that really stood out---their taillights.



  4. #4
    JonnyCab®
    Guest

    Re: Australia's Explorer

    PS...in looking through the wiring manual for the 2002-up 4-door Explorer, I
    found that ALL of the wiring for tri-color signals is already there, right
    up to the connector (a few inches in front of the grommet behind each
    taillight) for the small harness that connects to each taillight. The US
    Explorers simply don't use the separate signal-only lead, or the stop-only
    lead (except for the CHMSL).

    So all that wiring is there for no reason? Dumb.



  5. #5
    JonnyCab®
    Guest

    Re: Australia's Explorer

    Oh, and since the splash guards are made by the same company that makes the
    Ford factory molded splash guards, which you can buy at most Ford dealers, I
    would imagine you can find the Australian ones if you looked hard enough...



  6. #6
    JaWise
    Guest

    Re: Australia's Explorer

    >Personally, I don't understand why Ford chose to go back to the simple 

    It saves two light sockets and two light bulbs per explorer. Probly $10 in
    parts per vehicle. But after you make 100,000 of them it adds up. Same as how
    they did away with the dual sun visors in the 2002 and up models.

  7. #7
    JonnyCab®
    Guest

    Re: Australia's Explorer

    > It saves two light sockets and two light bulbs per explorer. Probly $10
    in 
    as how 

    Yeah, I miss the dual visors, too (I had a '99 XLT and now an '02 EB). But
    slicing away things that make up STYLE is not the way to cut costs---and
    nobody at Ford is losing money with the Explorer. The old Explorer had
    THREE turn signal bulbs in each front lamp when they only needed one. If
    GMC can put four bulbs per side in the back of the Envoy (reverse,
    stop/tail, tail-only, turn), there's no reason Ford can't---and the Envoy's
    tailllights just plain look better (but that's about ALL that looks better
    ...

    And, while I'm having fun complaining, where are the front cornering lights?
    They're even available on the Windstar/Freestar (and the Envoy). And how
    about rear fog lamps, like most Range Rovers (and even the Aurora) have.

    Jeez, make this stuff available in OPTION PACKAGES if money is so important.

    But I will post back if I can get a pair of the Aussie lamps from someone at
    Visteon.

    http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/7/web/307000-307999/307733_57_full.jpg

    Grrr...




 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48