Toyota: American check-in

dizzy wrote: 

Well, in my opionion, a Supra is worthless, but I dont care if you drive
one. 


So you dont like working, I thought so.

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:30:19 GMT, MDT Tech® <com>
wrote:
 

Why should you care? It's not an overweight pile of crap that puts
YOUR life in danger.
 

Idiot.

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:26:29 GMT, MDT Tech® <com>
wrote:
 

Wow. That post pretty much speaks for itself. "The fast and the
furious" shows that a Supra is as dangerous to others as a massive
SUV. Amazing.

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 01:49:21 GMT, MDT Tech® <com>
wrote:
 

Incorrect. I base my case on physics. You base yours on a ridiculous
Hollywood movie.
 

Now we all see how stupid you are, you mean.

dizzy wrote: 


And you base yours on your Sierra Club newsletter. Are you foaming Ditz?
It looks like slober on your "red" shirt.

dizzy <com> vomited violently forth in
news:com:
 


By your reasoning, we should never ride our bikes or walk anywhere near a
public road, as even the smallest vehicle can be fatally dangerous to a
human body.

How far are you willing to go in exercising control over other peoples'
lives in order to impose *your* idea of acceptable risk on them?

--
TeGGeR®

FJ40 ® <invalid> vomited violently forth in
news:com:
 


To me it's not much of a risk. In order for any weight differences to
become important, one must first crash into my car. The odds of that are
pretty small.

Your odds of being involved in a fatal or seriously injurious collision are
smaller than that of being struck by lightning.

This is not a safety issue. It is a control issue.

--
TeGGeR®

Well you don't need to worry. The US will continue to provide
protection from the rest of the world for Canada, like we always
have, even if some of you don't understand why we do what we have
always done.



mike hunt



"FJ40 ®" wrote: