+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Ford Explorer: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

  1. #1
    Ron
    Guest

    '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    Well if anyone remembers from a few weeks back I had my motor cleaned out with Ford engine cleaner to remove the carbon from
    my motor . Got it back with a knocking sound inside the motor . Mechanic had me drive it around hoping it was just some loose
    carbon floating around . Well the noise is gone but the pinging/knocking isn't . Tried removing the jumper inside the
    firewall that is supposed to retard the timing 2-3 degrees and the pinging is gone . Only problem is so is the power . Tried
    high octane but it's still pretty sluggish. So now I have to decide if I should put the jumper back in and use high octane
    gas or live with a slower truck that doesn't ping . Thanx for the feedback , lots of good knowledge out here !
    Ron



  2. #2
    AZGuy
    Guest

    Re: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:22:21 GMT, "Ron N.Y"
    <net> wrote:
     

    I don't recall all of this thread so.... Have you cleaned your MAF
    sensor (or replaced it)? My 92 used to ping in hot summer weather but
    after cleaning the MAF is no longer pings. Others have traced the
    pinging to leaking lower intake manifold gaskets that cause the
    mixture to be too lean (sucks in crankcase fumes which dilute the
    fuel/air mis). Is it possible you are running too hot a spark plug?
    Maybe the wrong heat range got put in and they are causing a hot spot
    and pinging.

    I've heard conflicting things about that jumper you disconnected. One
    story is it retards the spark 2-3 degrees but otherwise no other
    changes. The other story is that it sets the advance to "base" and
    allows no advance at all, hence the lack of power. I thought I read
    it was to be used to check base advance which lead me to suspect the
    second story was the true on.

  3. #3
    John
    Guest

    Re: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    I tried the jumper approach too. It caused less power and reduced gas
    mileage. I put it back on and ran high test from then on.

    On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:32:40 -0700, AZGuy <net>
    wrote:
     


  4. #4
    Ron
    Guest

    Re: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    Yep that's what I just did . The power reduction was too severe so I put the jumper back in and it runs much better with high
    octane anyway with more power .No pinging with the high octane gas so far . I was wondering if anyone with this problem tried
    using one of those performance chips to help on this problem , I didn't hear anyone mention it . My MAF sensor was clean ,
    there was no EGR valve , and the bolts on the intake manifold were tight . So high Octane it is , I give up ! Thanx for all
    the help out there !
    Ron

    "John Shoemaker" <yahoo.com> wrote in message news:com... 
    from 
    loose 
    Tried 
    octane 



  5. #5
    Tom
    Guest

    Re: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    I didn't notice any loss of power in our 93 Expl after removing the
    pin. The truck runs great. However, I haven't put it on the dyno for
    a before and after.

    I did try using higher octane gas before removing the pin but that
    didn't stop the pinging. As more miles are accumulated on the engine,
    more carbon builds up in the combustion chamber and cylinder pressure
    increases. Firing this old engine at the timing specified for a new
    engine will then cause the engine to knock.

    I can't agree that removing the pin will set the timing to the base
    value with no advance at all since there is no noticeable difference
    in driveability (at least for the 93 Exp).

    Before retarding the timing our Exp only knocked under mid to high
    accelerations, but the sound just sent chills down my spine, very ugly
    sound. I think Ford was trying to squeeze every ounce of fuel economy
    out of this engine so they timed it on the ragged edge, just below the
    knock threshold. Some newer cars use knock sensors to keep the
    ignition timing as far advanced as possible (to increase fuel econ and
    power) but avoid knocking by pulling back timing according to the
    knock sensor feedback.

    If higher octane gas with the pin in place is most economical then
    that is what I would do; provided the knock was gone. However, if
    lower octane gas with the pin removed was most economical then that
    would be my course. It should be perty easy to do some fuel economy
    measurements with both configurations and come to a conclusion.

    Hope this helps,

    Tom



    "Ron N.Y" <net> wrote in message news:<hDEnb.13527$srv.hcvlny.cv.net>... 

  6. #6
    Racin'
    Guest

    Re: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    Some of the discussion here sounds like pinging is normal as the truck gets
    older. I'll just input here that my truck has 193,000 miles on it and it
    doesn't ping.

    It used to ping, but I found some info about the lower intake manifold
    gasket leaking because of a poor design. The #5 spark plug would carbon up
    so that you could see the difference between the other spark plugs. Some
    folks replaced the gasket with success, ie. the pinging went away.

    But, I found that the intake manifold lower bolts loosen with engine cycles.

    So, you might want to just tighten the intake manifold lower bolts, very
    carefully, in the pattern recommended in Helms. They only tighten to 180
    inch pounds or so, so make sure you don't overtorque as you might crack the
    intake manifold.

    I don't think pinging is normal. But, sometimes, the root cause is hard to
    track down.



  7. #7
    wwj
    Guest

    Re: '93 knocking/pinging disaster follow-up

    My '94 also started to ping with regular gas at about 80k miles. I had 2
    problems:

    1) I had the leaking manifold problem. The small aluminum alloy bolts will
    loosen up over time. Check the spark plugs for black, sometimes oily
    deposits. If one or 2 have it while the others are clean you may have a
    manifold leak at that location. Re-torquing all bolts will usually stop the
    leak - mine did. But I've heard others had to replace the intake manifold
    gasket. Check manual for pattern and torque limit.

    2) My modulator (vacuum diaphram) on side of transmission leaked. Pull off
    the vacuum line that goes to modulator at the intake manifold vacuum tree.
    If it's oily, your engine is sucking trans fluid through the modulator.
    Replacing modulator eliminated problem. Let me know if you need to replace,
    there is an easy method.

    Other things to check:
    Fuel pressure at the fuel rail. If low, check for clogged gas filter,
    leaking injectors or weak pump. Also check the vacuum connection at the fuel
    pressure regulator while you're there. MAF sensor as mentioned below,
    cracked or loose vacuum lines/connections, computer codes, dirty fuel
    injectors. And of course the basics should be checked - engine vacuum, plugs
    and plug wires, ground connections, cylinder compression or cylinder leak
    down.

    At 120k miles my engine does not ping on regular gas.

    Good luck



    "AZGuy" <net> wrote in message
    news:com... 
    with Ford engine cleaner to remove the carbon from 
    had me drive it around hoping it was just some loose 
    isn't . Tried removing the jumper inside the 
    pinging is gone . Only problem is so is the power . Tried 
    should put the jumper back in and use high octane 
    feedback , lots of good knowledge out here ! 




 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48