Chrysler: 300C gallery

http://www.chrysler.com/300series/index.html?context=homepage&type=promo2

Chrysler has a gallery of photo's up if you are interested. The small
pictures that you click on look terrible and I first assumed that they
would just be enlarged. However it turns out that you actually get
nice full size shots of the 300C when you click on the small pictures.
The finished product would be fine if the grill was optional.

"Art Begun" <com> wrote in message
news8_gb.8565$news.atl.earthlink.net...
| http://www.chrysler.com/300series/index.html?context=homepage&type=promo2
|
| Chrysler has a gallery of photo's up if you are interested. The small
| pictures that you click on look terrible and I first assumed that they
| would just be enlarged. However it turns out that you actually get
| nice full size shots of the 300C when you click on the small pictures.
| The finished product would be fine if the grill was optional.
|
|

The 300C the next 300 series? Wouldn't/shouldn't the next series be the
"n"? In any event, it's too ''70's/80's "boxy" on the outside and too '60's
"brite" on the inside.

James C. Reeves <nospam.com> wrote:
 
If you compare the 300C with the newset lineup from Mercedes you'll
see why it looks the way it looks.
I'm afraid that Chrysler is now nothing more then a renamed Merc, just
like Dodges are renamed Chryslers.
Martin

In article <bm317l$dqa$kpn.com>,
Martin Boer <kpn.com> wrote: 
'60's 
Yeah, that rebadged Chrysler Neon and Viper!

James C. Reeves wrote:
 

Yes, but since 2005 is the 50th anniversary of the original C300 (there
was no '300A') I guess they're resetting the counter, so to speak.
 

I wouldn't say either of those things... and 60's brite would be
WONDERFUL if it were implemented with chrome, machine-turned stainless,
and white leather! I'm SICK of grey, black, and tan interiors. Those
colors are to 90s and 00's car interiors what avocodo and 'harvest
gold' were to 70s kitchen appliances. What ever happened to deep red,
pure white, dark green, bright red, and even blue interiors?

If I have any complaint, its that it looks too "2000s chiselled" to me.
Way too much like the Cadillac CTS and other slab-sided things with
oddly placed and oddly angled flat facets everywhere.

But overall, I actually like it.

I was planning to buy a 300 sometime in 2006/2007. Geuss not after all.
Don't like it kne bit. I MUCH prefer something closer to the current aero
style...it makes Chrysler vehicles stand out from just about anything out
there. This thing is boxy like everybody else now!

I love it. Does anybody know which Mercedes is under there?

And how can you assert that any jelly bean, Chrysler or otherwise, could
stand out anywhere? Not happening in my world. The 300M is just a jelly bean
with a chrome grille.

"James C. Reeves" <nospam.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

The interesting thing about the gallery is that Chrysler says it is
introducing Three 300's next year. The 300C is one. In Frankfurt,
they showed a 300 Touring wagon, sort of like the Dodge Magnum. That
leaves one more (and also gives some basis for the claim that the
Pacifica may be discontinued sometime soon, although all it really
needs is a better engine -- hemi anyone?)

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:47:51 -0400, "James C. Reeves"
<nospam.com> wrote: