Pontiac: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
-
2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
I had to go to Atlanta and South Carolina last week on business.
National Rent a car in Atlanta wanted $53/ day for a Sunbird/Cav
or $56/ day for a GP with Kompressor. After several milliseconds of
rationalizing away spending $15 more of the company's money I got
the GTP. It was fully loaded with everything.
Simply said, it was the most fun drive I have had in a long time.
It stuck to the twisty mountain roads like a Martian sand lizard
on a brick wall. And I thoroughly enjoyed the slight whine of
the Kompressor. Acceleration, while not like my friend's 03 Vette,
was still considerable - much more than I expected - probably more
than 90% of the cars on the road. Torque steer was very noticeable.
IMO, a car with that much power should be rear wheel drive.
Last week I had to go to Fort Worth, Texas and rented a Ford Escape
- fully loaded. It was a nice SUV. 6 cyl with good power
but, IMO, it was a very cheaply made mass production vehicle.
I found the seat too hard, no padding on the arm rests
very uncomfortable, and the stereo very poor sound quality (really bad).
I like the company's Ford Ranger P/U much better.
.... And now, back to the real world of a worn out 92 Grand Am.
-
Re: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
"« Paul »" <rr.co.tx> wrote in message
news:rr.co.tx...
I find even with a considerably less powerful 3.1L 2001 GP SE, I tend to
have too much wheelspin with the front wheel drive. Traction control seems
to come on even in the dry when I'm trying to get away a little too fast.
Did you notice the traction control coming on in the 2004 GTP that you had?
It's not that these cars are overpowered, they just seem that way with FWD,
since the front tires are doing all of the work of powering and steering the
car.
Yousuf Khan
-
Re: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Yes, traction control came on frequently but I prefered it that way.
With the Trac off, it was easy to spin the front tires on
dry pavement and create large clouds of smoke.
Due to other cars or road conditions, I was not able to
do any accel testing vs. numbers.
-
Re: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
A GP with Kompressor????
You mean it had a Mercedes Benz Kompressor attached to it ??
So your 92 is worn EH !?
=========
Harryface
=========
1991 Pontiac Bonneville LE, 3800 V6
_~_~_~_~275,068 miles_~_~_ ~_~_
-
Re: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
"« Paul »" <rr.co.tx> wrote in message
news:rr.co.tx...
seems
fast.
had?
FWD,
the
It looks like this car needs traction control at all times, not just in the
wet or snow. The big disadvantage of front wheel drive, it shifts its weight
balance to the rear during acceleration, at precisely the moment it needs to
have as much weight over the fronts as possible.
This car would have been one hell of a serious sports car if it had
all-wheel drive.
Yousuf Khan
-
Re: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
Harry Face wrote:
I have always liked those little chrome placques that say "Kompressor".
I think the GTP should have a little placque that says "Pressurized".
Yeah 
The drivers window almost fell out on the way to the airport and
I had to tape it up. That's today's project.
Brake lines are all frayed and seeping. That's tomorrow's project.
160k miles, 60k to go.
-
Re: 2004 GP GTP - Nice car!
"« Paul »" <rr.co.tx> wrote in message
news:rr.co.tx...
Then people would think that you got a pressurized cabin, like in an
airplane. :-)
Yousuf Khan
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules