+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Chrysler: 2000 vs 2001+ 300M

  1. #1
    Lloyd
    Guest

    Re: 2000 vs 2001+ 300M

    In article <Pdgfb.15683$news.atl.earthlink.net>,
    "Art Begun" <com> wrote: 
    I think also that only one model is crashed. As any scientist knows, you
    always want replicates since one measurement can have faulty data in it. I
    realize cars are too expensive for NHTSA or IIHS to crash more than one of
    each model, but still this kind of variation seems to indicate the data from
    just one crash may not be too reliable.

  2. #2
    khobar
    Guest

    2000 vs 2001+ 300M

    Hi folks,

    I'm considering a pre-owned Chrysler 300M/LHS and would like some info. I'm
    looking at the safety numbers and see the 2001 is vastly superior in the
    crash tests to the 2000. Could someone please explain to me what's different
    between the 2000 and 2001+ models that would make such a difference?

    Also, can anyone compare a 2000+ 300M to a 2000+ Bonneville in terms of ride
    quality/handling and comfort? Thanks.

    Paul Nixon



  3. #3
    Art
    Guest

    Re: 2000 vs 2001+ 300M

    Were side air bags added in 2001? Also sometimes a minor change can
    make all the difference in the world safety wise.


    "khobar" <net> wrote in message
    news:a1gfb.6455$.. 
    info. I'm 
    the 
    different 
    of ride 



  4. #4
    khobar
    Guest

    Re: 2000 vs 2001+ 300M

    Art Begun <com> wrote in message
    news:Pdgfb.15683$news.atl.earthlink.net... 
    Thanks for the input Art.

    I'm not sure. I saw a reference where SAB's were added as an option, but all
    of the cars crash-tested with side air bags had that noted. I thought
    perhaps that was what made the big difference when comparing the 300M/LHS
    against the Bonneville.

    I also came across a note that the airbags were modified in some way between
    2000 and 2001 to affect their deployment.

    I'm concerned about structural integrity. I've got three young children who
    would ride in the back in car seats and if that's the only thing taken into
    account then the Buick LeSabre is the vehicle of choice though I'd prefer
    something a little different.

    The Bonneville also ranks quite high but it's expensive when getting an SLE
    (don't want an SSEi) and I'm not sure I care for the interior. The 300M
    seems to fit the bill exactly as far as
    bells/whistles/performance/size/etc., but I want to try to be sure it's a
    good idea.

    Paul Nixon



  5. #5
    khobar
    Guest

    Re: 2000 vs 2001+ 300M

    Lloyd Parker <edu> wrote in message
    news:blk3d0$9oh$cc.emory.edu... 

    from 

    I am not sure. I saw some mention of the airbags being modified between 2000
    and 2001, and I have seen some mention of SAB's as an option at least.
    However, the tests typically indicate when SAB's are equipped.

    The 300M just looks like it would fit my needs to a "t", but since I have
    young children that would be riding in back I want to be sure. There's quite
    a difference in price between the 2000's and 2001's which if fine if it
    makes that much difference in real terms as far as safety is concerned.

    Paul



  6. #6
    Art
    Guest

    Re: 2000 vs 2001+ 300M

    By the way, check the tires. The later model may have Michelins. The
    earlier the original Goodyears which are terrible after 1 year of use
    based on my experience with 2 sets. I'm talking of the standard model
    with 17 inch wheels. Make sure your purchase comes with Michelins or
    figure on replacements soon after the purchase unless Goodyear has
    fixed their 17 inch tire problem.

    As I remember it the insurance institute also tested a 300M or one of
    its cousins when it first came out and it did not do well because the
    airbag launched later than it should have. Chrysler faulted the test
    which used an initial block of foam in front of the brick wall to
    simulate a collapsing frontend. Chrysler said it was too soft and
    stated that when they tested in a more realistic manner the car did
    very well (crashing into another car).


    "khobar" <net> wrote in message
    news:yjhfb.6458$.. 
    can 
    but all 
    thought 
    300M/LHS 
    between 
    children who 
    taken into 
    prefer 
    an SLE 
    300M 
    it's a 




 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48