Pontiac: #16 Heads...should I get them?
-
#16 Heads...should I get them?
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a build on my 400. It's a stock bore, with
CompCam 270 (224/224 .470/.470 112 - I think- LSA), rear end is a 3.08
and I have a Borg Warner Super T-10 4 speed. This is a weekend driver
on the street.
Ok...all that said, I have 6x-4 heads but one of them is cracked.
It'll cost me 120.00 to get that welded and get both my heads in
bolt-on shape.
I found some #16 (72cc) heads from a `68 GTO that are ready to go for
300.00 plus probably 60.00 in shipping.
Should I go for it or not? The CR would go from roughly 8.3:1 up to
9.8:1!
Also what gains would I get horsepower and torque wise on it....and is
it worth spending 250.00 more than I have to spend anyway for those
gains?
Thanks
-
Re: #16 Heads...should I get them?
I would question if an iron headed 9.8:1 cr with a Comp cams 270 cam
would run will on pump gas? Do the #16 heads have hardened exhaust
seats?
unix-freak wrote:
-
Re: #16 Heads...should I get them?
I have #16s on my '67 GTO. They came off a '68 428. I am trying to
remember everything I did, but I just can't. Anyway, I do have stock
pistons ( I think I do, anyway) and the Ram Air (S grind?) Comp Cams cam
installed. IIRC, the 428 had 10.75/1 stock compression. Also, IIRC the 428
and the 400 share the same piston size - the 400 has a shorter stroke which
should lower the compression number, right? Anyway, I run super (94)
exclusively - I've never tried regular (87). It runs very well with this
setup, but keep in mind that I had #16s on before the change as well. I
have no point of reference that would say they are better than the 6x heads,
but it will definately run with them.
For the HP/torque answer, check out the engines that had the #16s on them.
I believe a '67 catalina would have run them.
Finally, would I spend 180 more to have a set of heads that weren't ever
cracked? Yes, I would - but that's me...
"unix-freak" <com> wrote in message
news:google.com...
-
Re: #16 Heads...should I get them?
I really don't know if they have hardened seats.
Anyways, my engine builder convinced me to stay with my 6x-4s.
"Stan Weiss" <com> wrote in message
news:com...
-
Re: #16 Heads...should I get them?
It kind of pains me to say it, but as all the junkyards seem to melt
everything down over 10 years old, and since Pontiac 350's are considered
pretty worthless, I would guess tens of thousands of 6x-4's have been
recycled for 3 cents a pound. They made a large number of 77 350's, but I
think the majority have already been crushed. If anyone is in a junkyard and
spots a 77 Grand Prix with a 350, try to carry those heads out! It's sad to
think you'd have to repair something once so taken for granted.
"unix-freak" <com> wrote in message
news:EeWSb.5730$bellsouth.net...
-
Re: #16 Heads...should I get them?
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:55:01 -0500, "Joe" <net> wrote:
Hold the phone...... I have a 350 in my back yard. 74's ish What
should I look for ? Two barrell 350. Still good.
cw
kingdommatworldnetdotattdotnet
in NC
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules