+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Toyota: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

  1. #1
    Jennie
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    The matrix has a GM radio....


    "Nick" <net> wrote in message
    news:com... 



  2. #2
    Nick
    Guest

    # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    If Toyota or this newsgroup fail to acknowledge junk reception and
    sometimes sound on their 2002 model year radios who are they kidding.
    Failure to repsond to this important consumer fraud is absurd yet you
    respond to more stupid things and off subject and off Toyota subjects.
    Your the loser when you own a Toyota and fail to tlak about Rav 4 and
    I hear Highlander radio reception and overpriced radios in their for
    sure 2002 model year. What has number one car company done about
    it...NOTHING. Maybe small claims court can cure thier ill. Nick

  3. #3
    Pahsons
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    Falling asleep through Nick's post...
     

    Stupid ass

    --
    "If you can't change a tire, you're not allowed to have a beard. It's the
    most basic part of a car: If you don't know that much about a car, you
    really shouldn't be driving, should you?" - Jimmy Kimmel
    ntlhell rolls a six... deathwind is disembowelled with a chainsaw, run over
    with a rhino, fed to the fish and his computer taken away from him such
    that he doesn't bore us with that inane rot ever again. - ntlhell - A.G.G-
    T-A http://www.cafeshops.com/creexul.2534632

  4. #4
    MDT
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    Nick wrote:
     


    Hey Mike, is that you again?

    No problem, could not duplicate. And I own a 2003 Highlander. Maybe you
    are confusing radio reception with XM sattelite radios? Ever occur it
    was an outside interference or even the station distance?


  5. #5
    Bruce
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:32:40 GMT, someone who calls themselves Nick
    <net> wrote:
     

    The Clue Phone is ringing, and it's for you...

    Most of the base-model radios in all makes of modern cars are crap.
    They are made in large quantities to a pre-determined bid price
    target, and only need to keep working long enough for the car to get
    past the warranty date while working, period.

    If it's just an AM/FM radio, there is one circuit board with three
    or four LSI chips that do everything, and a lot of empty space in that
    big box. As long as they can build it for under $15, they don't care.
    And the speakers are just as cheap.

    Even the top of the line factory radios can't touch a really good
    aftermarket unit like a Blaupunkt or Sony, and a good set of speakers
    to drive. But you are going to pay dearly for the added reception and
    sound quality, plus add a real antenna to get rid of that worthless
    piece of wire embedded in the windshield.

    Long gone are the days when a base factory AM radio sounded good,
    was sensitive enough to pick up a mouse fart on a 5 Watt station two
    states away, and worked for 25 years without a whimper.

    I have one of those radios in my Corvair - a Delco hybrid
    cold-cathode tube receiver with one transistor for the PA amp final,
    anyone here want to rebuild it? Probably just a bunch of dried out
    electrolytic capacitors again.

    --<< Bruce >>---
    --
    Bruce L. Bergman, POB 394, Woodland Hills CA 91365, USA
    Electrician, Westend Electric (#726700) Agoura, CA

    WARNING: UCE Spam E-mail is not welcome here. I report violators.
    SpamBlock In Use - Remove the "Python" with a "net" to E-Mail.

  6. #6
    The
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios


    "Bruce L. Bergman" <INVALID> wrote in message
    news:com... 

    What are you talking about? The radio in my 99 Camry V6 is excellent. I have
    no trouble, even during the day, listening to AM stations from a city 200
    miles away.




  7. #7
    Car
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    The stock radios in the 2002 Camry are made by Panasonic
    "Bruce L. Bergman" <INVALID> wrote in message
    news:com... 



  8. #8
    Im
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    Spell check is FREE and is included with your newsreader.
    "THIER" it's t h e i r as in "the irs" makes it easy to remember.

    anyway. someone builds the overpriced stereos to toyota's specs.
    same with all car companies.

    You can buy better for less in the aftermarket.

    "Nick" <net> wrote in message
    news:com...
    : If Toyota or this newsgroup fail to acknowledge junk reception and
    : sometimes sound on their 2002 model year radios who are they kidding.
    : Failure to repsond to this important consumer fraud is absurd yet you
    : respond to more stupid things and off subject and off Toyota subjects.
    : Your the loser when you own a Toyota and fail to tlak about Rav 4 and
    : I hear Highlander radio reception and overpriced radios in their for
    : sure 2002 model year. What has number one car company done about
    : it...NOTHING. Maybe small claims court can cure thier ill. Nick



  9. #9
    Bruce
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 05:30:25 GMT, someone who calls themselves "The
    Sharxster" <com> wrote:
     

    That's a 4 year old car, call me back after 10 years when the base
    radio has died, or is suffering from obvious ailments like noisy pots,
    one channel dead or intermittent, or the sensitivity has gone to pot.
    Odds are, it will show it's age.

    Yes, the premium systems from the car makers will probably hold up
    halfway decently, but the base cheap radios are just that - base and
    cheap. They make sound and let you hear the traffic reports. If they
    do that much, most people ignore the crackle from the noisy pot and
    just find a point where it works.

    --<< Bruce >>--
    --
    Bruce L. Bergman, POB 394, Woodland Hills CA 91365, USA
    Electrician, Westend Electric (#726700) Agoura, CA

    WARNING: UCE Spam E-mail is not welcome here. I report violators.
    SpamBlock In Use - Remove the "Python" with a "net" to E-Mail.

  10. #10
    Nick
    Guest

    Re: # 1 Car Company Has Junk For Radios

    On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:32:40 GMT, Nick <net> wrote:
     


    I am soley speaking for the year 2002 Model rav 4 and nothing rlse but
    have heard Highlansders that year suffer reception problems too and
    that came from dealership. Mine is stamped Toyota brand radio. Go
    figure. Anyone know the specs like sensitivity. Lower numers are best
    and for example a Blaupunkt Model MP-72 called Los Angeles the lowest
    of all aftermarker and factoey at 6db. German engineering always did
    build better radios. Ask a shortwave guy about Grundig for example.
    Nevertheless Toyota had a excellent radio in my 1998 Rav 4 alos marked
    Toyota. Different size and no cd player in that one but reception
    superb. To posters who don't believe I wish they can hear mine. We
    have 13000 watt station in town and I can't hear it sometimes 5 miles
    away on fm 105. I still believe there was a run of bad units or combo
    units possibly unknown to Toyota or accepted status quo by public
    until now. They have chnaged the antenna placement and type and sure
    as hell had to change the connections which may lie at fault then.
    Could be why sometimes all right and other times not. They were all
    changed new but if from the same batch/supplier schematics then hence
    the same problem. Another point is I paid well over $800.00 sticker
    price for an overpriced piece of junk. Aftermarkets are cheaper and
    much better. SO I am asking Toyota since they won't fix or deal with
    it. Take it and give the money back under warranty and I will buy my
    own. They want to be number one let them prove it now. Also if you go
    to www.rav4world you will see the posts other than mine by typing a
    search under the 2002 model year for reception. I have scores of
    personal emails from people who agree with me and now spoken for
    having the same problem. When you live in a large city like New York,
    Atlanta, Los Angeles and big buildings have antennas all over, it's
    hard to judge someone in a semi rural mountain/valley enviroment
    unless your here. And if comparsion is my judge then why do they come
    in side by side on other makes and models and years and mine is almost
    new. And even some with antenna mounted in same location. Something is
    wrong and they refuse to spend time on it. If a wiring problem ,
    imagine the cost Toyota will incur on a trace and labor intensive job
    .. They don't care because it is not safety and no hand is forced. I
    alwasy thrived on local tlak, sports news, weather alerts and without
    the sensitive reception like I had previous what good is the
    overpriced radio. Hope this helps explain more my feelings of a
    becoming more prominent problem in this model year and make. Nick


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48