Chrysler: 02 PT Cruiser woes

031001 2048 - Ralph Pardue wrote:
 


They're made in Mexico. What can I say...

"indago" <net> wrote
 

Not fair. The PT has one of the best reliability records in the industry.
All models have occasional problem vehicles, though, and this seems to be
one.

kinda of the opposite results for me..........
2001 5 speed now with about 28K

faithfully change oil and filter between 5k and 7k. The PT is always run to
operating temp, I will not start it just to put it in the garage if it has
been sitting outside and cold. If you use it under "normal" conditions, I
feel you do not need to do the 3k change. As an aside I have had 2 rice
burners ( Toyota and a Subaru)and neither burned oil at 188K and 132K.....
the Subaru leaked a bit however.

Just got back from a 2,600 mile trip to S. Cal where the speeds at 75 and up
are easily attained and maintained. I ACTUALLY and REALLY and so on, got it
up to 110MPH. Not a lot of pedal left.
I was about .5 (1/2) quart down after that trip.

No excuse by the dealer for calling it normal for some PT's to use
oil........

I did have a slightly annoying problem of the PT just shutting itself off
while driving or just not starting.....I did get my attention when that
happened at 65 MPH.
Long story short.......dealer messed with it, tested it, send out the
flatbed to pick it up when it would not start, gave me a loaner, and could
not find anything using the computer and looking for codes.The mechanic even
changed a few relays, too. Called Chrysler ( I hinted that I might have
gotten a lemon) and they sent a module. Had it replaced and so far after
about 6 months it is fine.

As for Mexico, my feelings were that:
Strike one: A first year vehicle
Strike two: made in Mexico
Strike three: A Chrysler
===============================================
In spite of the above mentioned misgivings..........I am glad I have it, and
need to decide if I am going to up-grade it to a 2003 or 4 to get a 7/70,000
warrantee.......will take a major bath on the trade in.....

First new car in since 1965 (I do miss my Comet Cyclone 289,271HP)......

Rattle the dealer's cage a little!

h




--
com
In the words of the IMMORTAL USED CAR DEALER:
THERE IS AN ASS FOR EVERY SEAT!

I've got an 02 and have been very happy with it, but I did have an engine
oil leak, very very small, that my dealer wouldn't fix. That's right,
wouldn't. When, after jerking me around for awhile, I put my hand on the
back of the block, and held out two fingers covered with engine oil, the
service manager of the 5-star dealership told me. "I don't know what it is."
At that point, I went home called the Chrysler 800 number. THEY suggested
another dealer. Took it to another dealer where a 20 year old mechanic,
within 5 seconds of looking at my car, said "You got a little oil leak
here." It was fixed that afternoon and I have never bought my car back to
my original dealer again.

The moral of my story is, that even though you bought the car there, don't
hesitate to switch dealerships. Call the Chrysler 800 number and start a
complaint about the problem that isn't being fixed. If you have to, tell
them you want the Chrysler area service rep to meet you and discuss the
problem. And if your dealership gives you one of those survey forms, "how
did we do" ....make sure you fill it out and nail them with it!

Good Luck
SRG

"Ralph Pardue" <net> wrote in message
news:PBKeb.651709$.. 
auto 
the 
motor 
engine 
oil 
None 
fire. 

Ralph Pardue wrote: 

As far as the transmission - that is a common problem, called
"bump-shift", on some Chrysler electronic transmissions - I don't know
about the one in the PT, but I know it's true of the LH vehicles. I
don't know much about trannys, but from what's been explained on this ng
by others, on the LH vehicles, it has to do with the torque converter
lock-up clutch engagement. Some people report a similar "bump shift" at
higher speeds when the same clutch does its thing (there's a TSB on the
LH vehicles on this problem).

Anyway, in the LH vehicles, three things, separately or in combination,
have been known to fix it (or at least greatly reduce it) - it did on my
Concorde:
1) Disconnect the battery for 20 minutes or more so the TCM relearns its
settings.
2) Replace the transmission fluid and filter (make sure only ATF+4 goes
back in). You say you have only 17k miles on it, so it's unlikely the
fluid change will buy you anything - so maybe skip this step.
3) Have the dealer re-flash the TCM firmware with the latest (I know
with the LH vehicles, there was an update that addressed this problem -
again - I don't know about the PT).

I would try no. 1) first, since it's free and might fix it. In the mean
time, if you can get straight answers out of your dealer, you might
check to see if there is a TCM firmware update - maybe someone on this
ng can tell you if there is. Item 3) can only be done by the dealer
(they have to connect to Chrysler to download the firmware). It should
be done under warranty. When it goes out of warranty, the price can
vary greatly - anywhere from $65 to $120 depending on the dealer
(generally, the further out in the country and the smaller the dealer,
the lower the price).

I would strongly suggest that you get a subscription to AllData - $25
for a year. It will give you full access to all the TSB's - you might
find one on the TCM firmware update. Also you will have access to all
the info. right out of the Factory Service Manual, which from the sounds
of the rest of your post will more than pay for itself if you plan to
keep the vehicle and you do any of your own work. It's worth it for the
TSB's alone so you don't have to rely on the dealer for such info. I
used to recommend buying an FSM, but for the DIY'er, the AllData
subscription takes its place, plus more, and that's generally what I
recommend instead.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"Ralph Pardue" <net> wrote in message
news:PBKeb.651709$..
| My wife took our 2002 PT Cruiser into the dealership today to have the
auto
| transmission checked for clunky downshifting from 2nd to 1st gear. The
| dealer could not reproduce the fault in a 1 mile test drive. They fixed
the
| dome light again, but it failed to operate normally by the time she got
| home. You have to smack it to make it work. With only 17K miles, the
motor
| is loosing 1 quart of oil every 3K miles. We carefully broke-in the
engine
| and swapped over to Mobile 1 oil at 5K miles. I changed the oil at 100
| miles, 1000 miles and 5K miles ever since. I started using the Mobile 1
oil
| filters since the 100 mile point. We don't drive the engine hard, just
| normal. The dealer explained that is was normal for some PT's to use oil
| and that we shouldn't worry about it. There are no engine oil leaks.
None
| of my previous 12 new non-Chrysler vehicles have ever used oil. I can't
| believe the dealership would tell me that it is normal for a 1 year old
| motor to use oil. What gives? By the way, the power steering rack input
| hydraulic hose came loose and sprayed the exhaust, which started a big
fire.
| We were luck to get the fire out fast and no one was hurt. The dealer
| quickly repaired the hose coupling and said it was a miracle the vehicle
| wasn't a total loss. Where is the quality control?
|
|

The family has been buying Chryslers since 1987, including my kids. The 87
Caravan 3.0 V6 I had burned a little oil after about 80K miles. My father's
87 3.9 V6 Dakota always burned a little oil from new (about 1-2 quarts
between changes) and he still has it...running fine. My 89 Dakota with the
same engine, never burned oil. Of the remaining list overall (96 Dakota V8,
97 Neon, 97 Grand Caravan, 2000 Neon, 2003 Stratus and 2004 Sebring) none
burn oil, so far. All have been outstanding vehicles overall, actually
(knock on wood)!

James C. Reeves wrote: 

My 96 GV with the 3.3L engine has consumed about a quart of oil every
2,500 miles since I bought it used with 34,000 on it. The good news is
that with 140,000 it still uses the same amount of oil, about two quarts
between each change at 5,000 mile intervals. I've used Mobil 1 since I
bought it. My dad's Dynasty with the same engine uses almost the same
amount of oil and he uses Castrol dinosaur oil.

Most car makers consider anything less than a quart per 1,000 miles to
be OK. My 4.3L Chevy truck burns less, about a quart every 3,500 miles.
My Jeep Comanche with the 2.5L engine used less than 1/4 a quart in
5,000 miles and is still running at nearly 150,000 miles (I don't own it
now though). My Honda Accord hardly came off the dipstick full mark in
5,000 miles ... and its engine had a top-end self-destruction at 72,000
miles. So, I don't equate low oil consumption with goodness necessarily.


Matt

"Matthew S. Whiting" <org> wrote: 

Kind of amazing how some consumers will accept poor quality as the norm.
Perhaps that explains why the J.D. Powers surveys always seem so screwed
up.

Burning oil in a modern 4-cycle, gas engine is NOT normal, regardless of
what you've been told, especially at a quart per thousand miles. That's not
only senseless; that's obscene. Most drivers do 1,000 miles every month, on
average. Try burning a quart of motor oil in your house each month and see
if you find that acceptable. Make sure your kids inhale the fumes, too, and
the younger the better. If they live, they'll be good little consumers.

Einstein said that only the universe and human stupidity were infinite, but
he wasn't sure about the universe.

doc